Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 0

    Accessibility

  • 0

    Best Practices

  • 0

    SEO

wordpool.org

wordpool.org - This website is for sale! - wordpool Resources and Information.

Page Load Speed

3 sec in total

First Response

383 ms

Resources Loaded

2.3 sec

Page Rendered

310 ms

wordpool.org screenshot

About Website

Visit wordpool.org now to see the best up-to-date Wordpool content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about wordpool.org

This website is for sale! wordpool.org is your first and best source for all of the information you’re looking for. From general topics to more of what you would expect to find here, wordpool.org has ...

Visit wordpool.org

Key Findings

We analyzed Wordpool.org page load time and found that the first response time was 383 ms and then it took 2.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

wordpool.org performance score

0

Network Requests Diagram

wordpool.org

383 ms

prj.js

317 ms

zxml.js

320 ms

main.js

332 ms

main.css

349 ms

Our browser made a total of 58 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 93% of them (54 requests) were addressed to the original Wordpool.org, 3% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 2% (1 request) were made to S3.amazonaws.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Wordpool.org.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 118.9 kB (28%)

Content Size

426.5 kB

After Optimization

307.5 kB

In fact, the total size of Wordpool.org main page is 426.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 328.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-89%

Potential reduce by 49.3 kB

  • Original 55.6 kB
  • After minification 50.6 kB
  • After compression 6.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 49.3 kB or 89% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-15%

Potential reduce by 49.5 kB

  • Original 328.1 kB
  • After minification 278.6 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Wordpool needs image optimization as it can save up to 49.5 kB or 15% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-30%

Potential reduce by 8.8 kB

  • Original 29.2 kB
  • After minification 27.5 kB
  • After compression 20.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 8.8 kB or 30% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 11.4 kB

  • Original 13.5 kB
  • After minification 11.6 kB
  • After compression 2.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Wordpool.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 11.4 kB or 84% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 3 (5%)

Requests Now

56

After Optimization

53

The browser has sent 56 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Wordpool. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

SEO Factors

wordpool.org SEO score

0

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    BG

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Wordpool.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed Bulgarian language. Our system also found out that Wordpool.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Wordpool. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: