3 sec in total
383 ms
2.3 sec
310 ms
Visit wordpool.org now to see the best up-to-date Wordpool content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about wordpool.org
This website is for sale! wordpool.org is your first and best source for all of the information you’re looking for. From general topics to more of what you would expect to find here, wordpool.org has ...
Visit wordpool.orgWe analyzed Wordpool.org page load time and found that the first response time was 383 ms and then it took 2.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
wordpool.org performance score
383 ms
317 ms
320 ms
332 ms
349 ms
Our browser made a total of 58 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 93% of them (54 requests) were addressed to the original Wordpool.org, 3% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 2% (1 request) were made to S3.amazonaws.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Wordpool.org.
Page size can be reduced by 118.9 kB (28%)
426.5 kB
307.5 kB
In fact, the total size of Wordpool.org main page is 426.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 328.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 49.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 49.3 kB or 89% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 49.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Wordpool needs image optimization as it can save up to 49.5 kB or 15% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 8.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 8.8 kB or 30% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 11.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Wordpool.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 11.4 kB or 84% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 3 (5%)
56
53
The browser has sent 56 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Wordpool. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
wordpool.org
383 ms
prj.js
317 ms
zxml.js
320 ms
main.js
332 ms
main.css
349 ms
links.css
358 ms
cookieconsent.latest.min.js
15 ms
blank.gif
177 ms
bgnd_body.png
150 ms
bgnd_header.png
136 ms
bgnd_header_body.png
152 ms
logo.png
142 ms
header_search.png
135 ms
btn_30.png
267 ms
bgnd_tools.png
268 ms
sep_gg.gif
293 ms
bgnd_wrapper.gif
297 ms
header_button_h.png
298 ms
menu_bg.gif
301 ms
left_head.png
399 ms
left_body.png
400 ms
avatar_small.jpg
436 ms
59.jpg
446 ms
57.jpg
447 ms
58.jpg
456 ms
left_bottom.png
530 ms
182.jpg
531 ms
194.jpg
714 ms
139.jpg
593 ms
118.jpg
594 ms
183.jpg
605 ms
78.jpg
662 ms
90.jpg
662 ms
72.jpg
739 ms
7.jpg
742 ms
44.jpg
753 ms
38.jpg
793 ms
43.jpg
1461 ms
31.jpg
850 ms
main_head.png
885 ms
main_body.png
890 ms
main_bottom.png
902 ms
q_ring.png
924 ms
ga.js
9 ms
class.image.php
1240 ms
59803
191 ms
__utm.gif
14 ms
class.image.php
1135 ms
class.image.php
1127 ms
class.image.php
1125 ms
class.image.php
1105 ms
class.image.php
1263 ms
class.image.php
1181 ms
class.image.php
1167 ms
class.image.php
1161 ms
class.image.php
1166 ms
bgnd_footer.png
1250 ms
dots_og.png
1274 ms
wordpool.org SEO score
EN
BG
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Wordpool.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed Bulgarian language. Our system also found out that Wordpool.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
wordpool.org
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Wordpool. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: