2.7 sec in total
792 ms
1.4 sec
422 ms
Click here to check amazing Worldpressinstitute content for Nigeria. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about worldpressinstitute.org
Visit worldpressinstitute.orgWe analyzed Worldpressinstitute.org page load time and found that the first response time was 792 ms and then it took 1.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.
worldpressinstitute.org performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.4 s
6/100
10%
Value56.5 s
0/100
25%
Value16.7 s
0/100
10%
Value1,170 ms
21/100
30%
Value0.049
99/100
15%
Value31.1 s
0/100
10%
792 ms
105 ms
98 ms
95 ms
106 ms
Our browser made a total of 84 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 71% of them (60 requests) were addressed to the original Worldpressinstitute.org, 2% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Youtube.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (792 ms) belongs to the original domain Worldpressinstitute.org.
Page size can be reduced by 736.8 kB (74%)
989.9 kB
253.1 kB
In fact, the total size of Worldpressinstitute.org main page is 989.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 524.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 22.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 22.2 kB or 72% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 69.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Worldpressinstitute needs image optimization as it can save up to 69.5 kB or 75% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 364.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 364.1 kB or 69% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 281.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Worldpressinstitute.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 281.1 kB or 82% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 54 (67%)
81
27
The browser has sent 81 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Worldpressinstitute. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 34 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
worldpressinstitute.org
792 ms
system.base.css
105 ms
system.menus.css
98 ms
system.messages.css
95 ms
system.theme.css
106 ms
comment.css
106 ms
field.css
109 ms
logintoboggan.css
123 ms
node.css
121 ms
search.css
114 ms
user.css
116 ms
video_filter.css
116 ms
views.css
117 ms
colorbox_style.css
126 ms
ctools.css
135 ms
at.settings.style.headings.css
136 ms
at.settings.style.image.css
141 ms
at.settings.style.floatblocks.css
148 ms
at.layout.css
148 ms
html-elements.css
138 ms
forms.css
141 ms
tables.css
140 ms
page.css
142 ms
articles.css
145 ms
comments.css
146 ms
fields.css
147 ms
blocks.css
147 ms
navigation.css
166 ms
colors.css
166 ms
sky.settings.style.css
155 ms
wpistyles.css
163 ms
print.css
157 ms
wpitheme.responsive.layout.css
158 ms
wpitheme.fonts.css
161 ms
js_UWQINlriydSoeSiGQxToOUdv493zEa7dpsXC1OtYlZU.js
178 ms
js_ax1cMLJIemCn4u4oCkbLJC7ZnduG3DSZxMwApANihKk.js
177 ms
buttons.js
19 ms
js_I8yX6RYPZb7AtMcDUA3QKDZqVkvEn35ED11_1i7vVpc.js
202 ms
js_1jH5XreR-wRIJhGWuuffIB7ohz69BSBvMdd0CNOgg0w.js
135 ms
analytics.js
167 ms
wZYOFQJwLN0
248 ms
2014%20Fellows%20with%20Thomas%20Friedman_0.jpg
156 ms
237x131_DonateNow.png
200 ms
getAllAppDefault.esi
39 ms
pg1_leftpix.jpg
34 ms
UST-logo.gif
70 ms
facebook_logo.png
55 ms
twitter_logo.png
61 ms
lucas-mendes-2015.jpg
68 ms
Elisabetta-Pique.jpg
124 ms
Bano.jpg
90 ms
SouthAfrica.jpg
81 ms
niemi1.jpg
68 ms
Australia_king.jpg
87 ms
Andras.jpg
81 ms
india03.jpg
90 ms
homepage02b_0.jpg
28 ms
homepage03b.jpg
126 ms
homepage12.gif
33 ms
homepage17.gif
28 ms
homepage09.jpg
27 ms
search-button.png
55 ms
background_blend.jpg
55 ms
homepage18long.jpg
57 ms
black.png
53 ms
collect
29 ms
zBSuBtpK9DM
108 ms
getSegment.php
29 ms
checkOAuth.esi
22 ms
t.dhj
14 ms
t.dhj
18 ms
www-embed-player-vflQrT_sR.css
69 ms
www-embed-player.js
97 ms
cm
35 ms
s-3271.xgi
12 ms
19 ms
hbpix
135 ms
8 ms
xrefid.xgi
9 ms
pixel
37 ms
pixel
75 ms
yrK4EqpSRdoujKQmsJoZ5WaLgeULvcWnibQMQSxOOnM.js
59 ms
ad_status.js
62 ms
2981
28 ms
worldpressinstitute.org accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
worldpressinstitute.org best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
worldpressinstitute.org SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Worldpressinstitute.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Worldpressinstitute.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
worldpressinstitute.org
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Worldpressinstitute. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: