4 sec in total
26 ms
3.7 sec
192 ms
Click here to check amazing WP Film content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about wpfilm.com
Visit wpfilm.comWe analyzed Wpfilm.com page load time and found that the first response time was 26 ms and then it took 3.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
wpfilm.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.5 s
15/100
10%
Value10.2 s
0/100
25%
Value12.5 s
3/100
10%
Value3,760 ms
1/100
30%
Value0.028
100/100
15%
Value19.4 s
2/100
10%
26 ms
1607 ms
24 ms
20 ms
32 ms
Our browser made a total of 91 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 75% of them (68 requests) were addressed to the original Wpfilm.com, 4% (4 requests) were made to Maxcdn.bootstrapcdn.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.6 sec) belongs to the original domain Wpfilm.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.5 MB (50%)
3.1 MB
1.5 MB
In fact, the total size of Wpfilm.com main page is 3.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 1.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 102.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 102.9 kB or 76% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 14.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. WP Film images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 967.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 967.4 kB or 72% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 440.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Wpfilm.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 440.1 kB or 82% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 63 (75%)
84
21
The browser has sent 84 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of WP Film. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 34 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 25 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
wpfilm.com
26 ms
www.wpfilm.com
1607 ms
cloudflare.min.js
24 ms
font-awesome.min.css
20 ms
memberpress.css
32 ms
buddypress.css
35 ms
bbpress.css
32 ms
multisite.css
33 ms
theme.css
58 ms
account.css
58 ms
jquery-ui.css
69 ms
signup.css
60 ms
admin-ajax.php
1415 ms
bbpress.css
63 ms
buddypress.min.css
57 ms
1067 ms
style.css
62 ms
components.css
67 ms
wpcufpn_front.css
66 ms
css
63 ms
jquery.js
71 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
70 ms
jquery.payment.js
74 ms
validate.js
70 ms
i18n.js
69 ms
core.min.js
69 ms
datepicker.min.js
73 ms
date_picker.js
72 ms
signup.js
72 ms
confirm.min.js
82 ms
widget-members.min.js
81 ms
jquery-query.min.js
77 ms
jquery-cookie.min.js
90 ms
jquery-scroll-to.min.js
92 ms
buddypress.min.js
94 ms
navbar.js
91 ms
lightcase.css
106 ms
lightcase.js
98 ms
font-awesome.min.css
47 ms
oct.js
69 ms
style.css
127 ms
formreset.min.css
93 ms
formsmain.min.css
101 ms
readyclass.min.css
101 ms
browsers.min.css
90 ms
editor.js
96 ms
site.js
80 ms
common.js
78 ms
script.cycle.js
81 ms
script.bootstrap.min.js
77 ms
script.blocks.js
78 ms
wp-embed.min.js
78 ms
jquery.json.js
77 ms
gravityforms.min.js
78 ms
css
21 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
73 ms
bag2
225 ms
analytics.js
73 ms
main.js
450 ms
fbds.js
262 ms
adsct
284 ms
adsct
72 ms
quant.js
69 ms
wpfilms-logo.png
92 ms
black-linen.png
231 ms
legacy-slide-wpfilms.jpg
233 ms
hgr-release-slide.jpg
234 ms
wpfilm-wws-slides.jpg
234 ms
hgr-teaser-slide.jpg
234 ms
wanderlustiswp-slide.jpg
234 ms
hg-slide.jpg
322 ms
stos-slide.jpg
299 ms
findinggodinthebible-slide.jpg
307 ms
bethel-workshop.jpg
229 ms
hgr-project.jpg
249 ms
HG-project.jpg
247 ms
FOL-project.jpg
246 ms
FLV-project.jpg
249 ms
FOG-project.jpg
278 ms
FLE-project.jpg
248 ms
tgf-project-poster.jpg
269 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
190 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
191 ms
count.js
209 ms
collect
166 ms
pixel;r=865231038;a=p-FJDreAz8Dwef6;fpan=1;fpa=P0-1047866936-1456808720978;ns=0;ce=1;cm=;je=0;sr=1024x768x32;enc=n;dst=0;et=1456808720977;tzo=-180;ref=;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.wpfilm.com%2F;ogl=title.Home%2Curl.http%3A%2F%2Fwww%252Ewpfilm%252Ecom%2F%2Csite_name.WP%20Films%2Cdescription.Our%20Films%2Ctype.article%2Curl.http%3A%2F%2Fwww%252Ewpfilm%252Ecom%2F%2Ctitle.WP%20Films%20%7C%20Home%2Cdescription.
160 ms
93 ms
collect
56 ms
ga-audiences
238 ms
update.html
58 ms
21 ms
wpfilm.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
wpfilm.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
wpfilm.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Wpfilm.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Wpfilm.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
wpfilm.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of WP Film. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: