Tools & Wizards About Us
writingfont.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 0

    Accessibility

  • 0

    Best Practices

  • 0

    SEO

writingfont.com

DropCatch.com

Page Load Speed

4.6 sec in total

First Response

102 ms

Resources Loaded

4.3 sec

Page Rendered

157 ms

writingfont.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to writingfont.com homepage info - get ready to check Writingfont best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about writingfont.com

DropCatch.com helps you secure expiring domain names.

Visit writingfont.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Writingfont.com page load time and found that the first response time was 102 ms and then it took 4.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

writingfont.com performance score

0

Network Requests Diagram

writingfont.com

102 ms

leBj2pt0HKJh_Wh_2x0_Njdlakw.js

320 ms

node.css

24 ms

defaults.css

25 ms

system.css

32 ms

Our browser made a total of 65 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 49% of them (32 requests) were addressed to the original Writingfont.com, 9% (6 requests) were made to Writing-fonts.com and 8% (5 requests) were made to S.swiftypecdn.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3 sec) belongs to the original domain Writingfont.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 487.6 kB (50%)

Content Size

968.0 kB

After Optimization

480.5 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Writingfont.com main page is 968.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 517.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 72.4 kB

  • Original 91.9 kB
  • After minification 90.1 kB
  • After compression 19.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 72.4 kB or 79% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 3.8 kB

  • Original 227.8 kB
  • After minification 224.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Writingfont images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-60%

Potential reduce by 311.8 kB

  • Original 517.5 kB
  • After minification 510.4 kB
  • After compression 205.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 311.8 kB or 60% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-76%

Potential reduce by 99.6 kB

  • Original 130.8 kB
  • After minification 96.2 kB
  • After compression 31.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Writingfont.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 99.6 kB or 76% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 28 (48%)

Requests Now

58

After Optimization

30

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 58 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Writingfont. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 19 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

writingfont.com

writingfont.com

102 ms

leBj2pt0HKJh_Wh_2x0_Njdlakw.js

leBj2pt0HKJh_Wh_2x0_Njdlakw.js

320 ms

node.css

node.css

24 ms

defaults.css

defaults.css

25 ms

system.css

system.css

32 ms

system-menus.css

system-menus.css

25 ms

user.css

user.css

32 ms

content-module.css

content-module.css

46 ms

views.css

views.css

42 ms

style.css

style.css

950 ms

icons.css

icons.css

1951 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

1957 ms

drupal.js

drupal.js

3002 ms

swfobject.js

swfobject.js

3004 ms

script.js

script.js

3014 ms

show_ads.js

show_ads.js

4 ms

pinit.js

pinit.js

7 ms

style.css

style.css

39 ms

style.css

style.css

17 ms

FjPKkVpifqPgZRox9OzGnDeSif0.js

FjPKkVpifqPgZRox9OzGnDeSif0.js

879 ms

embed.js

embed.js

27 ms

swiftype_nocode-ce1ccc92e367d18dfb4eb6c794612b22.js

swiftype_nocode-ce1ccc92e367d18dfb4eb6c794612b22.js

3 ms

swiftype_nocode-771446ccd87923542f4fc025c63a4e98.css

swiftype_nocode-771446ccd87923542f4fc025c63a4e98.css

19 ms

wood.jpg

wood.jpg

1142 ms

ga.js

ga.js

15 ms

pencils.png

pencils.png

104 ms

pinit_fg_en_rect_red_20.png

pinit_fg_en_rect_red_20.png

14 ms

header.jpg

header.jpg

80 ms

writing-fonts-banner-conversion.jpg

writing-fonts-banner-conversion.jpg

82 ms

create-letters-online.jpg

create-letters-online.jpg

103 ms

download-writing-fonts.jpg

download-writing-fonts.jpg

138 ms

icon_01.jpg

icon_01.jpg

79 ms

no1.jpg

no1.jpg

940 ms

icon_02.jpg

icon_02.jpg

79 ms

no2.jpg

no2.jpg

79 ms

icon_03.jpg

icon_03.jpg

77 ms

no3.jpg

no3.jpg

136 ms

icon_04.jpg

icon_04.jpg

970 ms

no4.jpg

no4.jpg

981 ms

all.js

all.js

136 ms

ca-pub-9718637414403532.js

ca-pub-9718637414403532.js

169 ms

zrt_lookup.html

zrt_lookup.html

165 ms

show_ads_impl.js

show_ads_impl.js

92 ms

wood.jpg

wood.jpg

114 ms

overlay_bg-f961a304598ef89480acb4f9c7f4d558.png

overlay_bg-f961a304598ef89480acb4f9c7f4d558.png

72 ms

cc.js

cc.js

65 ms

header.jpg

header.jpg

85 ms

writing-fonts-banner-conversion.jpg

writing-fonts-banner-conversion.jpg

83 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

79 ms

pinit_main.js

pinit_main.js

77 ms

create-letters-online.jpg

create-letters-online.jpg

76 ms

pencils.png

pencils.png

75 ms

download-writing-fonts.jpg

download-writing-fonts.jpg

73 ms

ads

ads

203 ms

osd.js

osd.js

47 ms

cc

cc

116 ms

119 ms

0sTQzbapM8j.js

0sTQzbapM8j.js

61 ms

0sTQzbapM8j.js

0sTQzbapM8j.js

88 ms

count.json

count.json

35 ms

ping

ping

33 ms

like.php

like.php

97 ms

like.php

like.php

98 ms

Iv-bqISgsE7.js

Iv-bqISgsE7.js

103 ms

lH1ibRl5GKq.png

lH1ibRl5GKq.png

107 ms

SEO Factors

writingfont.com SEO score

0

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Writingfont.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Writingfont.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

writingfont.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Writingfont. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: