2.7 sec in total
1 sec
1.5 sec
214 ms
Visit xavortm.com now to see the best up-to-date Xavortm content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about xavortm.com
My corner of the web
Visit xavortm.comWe analyzed Xavortm.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1 sec and then it took 1.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.
xavortm.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.7 s
60/100
10%
Value2.7 s
85/100
25%
Value3.5 s
89/100
10%
Value0 ms
100/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value2.7 s
97/100
10%
1001 ms
19 ms
17 ms
25 ms
19 ms
Our browser made a total of 48 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 88% of them (42 requests) were addressed to the original Xavortm.com, 6% (3 requests) were made to S.gravatar.com and 2% (1 request) were made to S0.wp.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1 sec) belongs to the original domain Xavortm.com.
Page size can be reduced by 663.5 kB (24%)
2.8 MB
2.2 MB
In fact, the total size of Xavortm.com main page is 2.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 2.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 73.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 73.5 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 382.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Xavortm needs image optimization as it can save up to 382.3 kB or 16% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 136.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 136.8 kB or 63% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 70.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Xavortm.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 70.8 kB or 85% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 31 (69%)
45
14
The browser has sent 45 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Xavortm. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 18 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 15 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
xavortm.com
1001 ms
subscriptions.css
19 ms
normalize.css
17 ms
style.css
25 ms
ie9.css
19 ms
styles.css
20 ms
widgets.css
19 ms
modernizr.custom-2.6.2.min.js
22 ms
prefixfree.min.js
21 ms
jquery.js
60 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
49 ms
jquery.hammer.min.js
49 ms
xavortm.com
380 ms
jquery.form.min.js
48 ms
scripts.js
52 ms
devicepx-jetpack.js
12 ms
gprofiles.js
79 ms
wpgroho.js
50 ms
jquery.transit.min.js
49 ms
comment-reply.min.js
51 ms
jquery.easing.1.3.js
68 ms
jquery.fitvids.js
66 ms
overthrow.js
67 ms
jquery.hoverIntent.min.js
67 ms
jquery.footer.custom.js
67 ms
e-201611.js
39 ms
dark_wall.png
36 ms
subscriptions.css
30 ms
normalize.css
25 ms
style.css
32 ms
ie9.css
48 ms
styles.css
54 ms
widgets.css
56 ms
main.png
26 ms
LoL.png
180 ms
falcon.png
186 ms
lighter.png
26 ms
bamboo.png
28 ms
studiox.png
180 ms
Emma-Application.png
187 ms
Azuris.png
180 ms
Skype-Redesign.png
181 ms
Pixus-Icon-Set-Vol.1.png
182 ms
ProximaNova-Regular.otf
153 ms
ProximaNova-Bold.otf
155 ms
g.gif
139 ms
hovercard.css
27 ms
services.css
55 ms
xavortm.com accessibility score
xavortm.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
xavortm.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Xavortm.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Xavortm.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
xavortm.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Xavortm. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: