4.7 sec in total
1.3 sec
3.1 sec
330 ms
Click here to check amazing Xcelgo content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about xcelgo.com
Improve project results and performance with Xcelgo's innovative software for Digital Twin modeling and virtual commissioning of automation systems.
Visit xcelgo.comWe analyzed Xcelgo.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.3 sec and then it took 3.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
xcelgo.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.2 s
20/100
10%
Value11.6 s
0/100
25%
Value12.3 s
3/100
10%
Value1,170 ms
21/100
30%
Value0.887
3/100
15%
Value12.2 s
15/100
10%
1271 ms
24 ms
440 ms
36 ms
223 ms
Our browser made a total of 102 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 34% of them (35 requests) were addressed to the original Xcelgo.com, 17% (17 requests) were made to Xcelgo.com.linux61.unoeuro-server.com and 12% (12 requests) were made to Maps.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Xcelgo.com.
Page size can be reduced by 906.8 kB (52%)
1.8 MB
845.7 kB
In fact, the total size of Xcelgo.com main page is 1.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 1.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 33.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 33.9 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 21.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Xcelgo images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 764.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 764.1 kB or 67% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 87.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Xcelgo.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 87.3 kB or 82% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 54 (59%)
92
38
The browser has sent 92 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Xcelgo. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 33 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
xcelgo.com
1271 ms
css
24 ms
style.css
440 ms
css
36 ms
styles.css
223 ms
shortcodes.css
332 ms
shortcodes_responsive.css
226 ms
jquery.fancybox-1.3.4.css
225 ms
page_templates.css
225 ms
jquery.js
655 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
335 ms
css
16 ms
jquery.form.min.js
233 ms
scripts.js
237 ms
superfish.js
358 ms
jquery.easing.1.3.js
359 ms
jquery.flexslider-min.js
358 ms
custom.js
378 ms
lgs_jquery.cycle2.js
622 ms
jquery.fancybox-1.3.4.pack.js
443 ms
et-ptemplates-frontend.js
452 ms
wp-embed.min.js
453 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
323 ms
ga.js
27 ms
__utm.gif
62 ms
96.js
220 ms
xcelgo-logo1.jpg
322 ms
maps
212 ms
logo01.jpg
316 ms
logo02.jpg
354 ms
logo03.jpg
420 ms
logo05.jpg
318 ms
logo04.jpg
533 ms
logo06.jpg
421 ms
logo07.jpg
426 ms
logo08.jpg
429 ms
logo09.jpg
465 ms
logo10.jpg
533 ms
logo11.jpg
531 ms
logo12.jpg
537 ms
logo13.jpg
540 ms
logo14.jpg
575 ms
logo15.jpg
641 ms
logo16.jpg
640 ms
body-bg.jpg
208 ms
search_btn.png
210 ms
twitter.png
207 ms
rss.png
207 ms
facebook.png
209 ms
slide1-870x230.jpg
441 ms
slide2-870x230.jpg
329 ms
slide3-870x230.jpg
435 ms
slide4-870x230.jpg
337 ms
sidebar_bullet.png
230 ms
arrow5.png
230 ms
arrow5-prev.png
339 ms
left-arrow.png
258 ms
right-arrow.png
355 ms
s-BiyweUPV0v-yRb-cjciMDdSZkkecOE1hvV7ZHvhyU.ttf
124 ms
EFpQQyG9GqCrobXxL-KRMcBaWKZ57bY3RXgXH6dOjZ0.ttf
125 ms
orbitron-medium.otf
365 ms
VK2oK8L4CJesxwY5dF3zxSwlidHJgAgmTjOEEzwu1L8.ttf
125 ms
embed
463 ms
js
73 ms
init_embed.js
64 ms
common.js
57 ms
map.js
57 ms
google4.png
96 ms
overlay.js
12 ms
SleeknoteClientTemplate.min.js.gz
68 ms
util.js
107 ms
onion.js
64 ms
search_impl.js
89 ms
StaticMapService.GetMapImage
142 ms
stats.js
75 ms
ViewportInfoService.GetViewportInfo
76 ms
kh
98 ms
piwik.js
16 ms
4670.html
186 ms
4670.html
180 ms
transparent.png
61 ms
piwik.php
219 ms
controls.js
25 ms
vt
94 ms
vt
74 ms
vt
104 ms
css
102 ms
mapcnt6.png
46 ms
reset.css.gz
10 ms
default-with-image_minified-image.png
21 ms
jquery.min.js
37 ms
sleeknoteIframeScript.min.js.gz
13 ms
default-with-image_minified-icon.png
20 ms
jquery.placeholder.min.js
10 ms
jquery.validate.min.js
62 ms
default-with-image_close.png
17 ms
AuthenticationService.Authenticate
45 ms
mobile-close.png
13 ms
QHD8zigcbDB8aPfIoaupKOvvDin1pK8aKteLpeZ5c0A.ttf
40 ms
RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUSZ2oysoEQEeKwjgmXLRnTc.ttf
47 ms
Hgo13k-tfSpn0qi1SFdUfSZ2oysoEQEeKwjgmXLRnTc.ttf
58 ms
d-6IYplOFocCacKzxwXSOCZ2oysoEQEeKwjgmXLRnTc.ttf
71 ms
xcelgo.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Links do not have a discernible name
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
xcelgo.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
xcelgo.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Xcelgo.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Xcelgo.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
xcelgo.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Xcelgo. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: