8.9 sec in total
2.9 sec
5.8 sec
227 ms
Visit yagm.ru now to see the best up-to-date Yagm content for Russia and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about yagm.ru
Visit yagm.ruWe analyzed Yagm.ru page load time and found that the first response time was 2.9 sec and then it took 6.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster. This domain responded with an error, which can significantly jeopardize Yagm.ru rating and web reputation
yagm.ru performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value9.7 s
0/100
10%
Value11.0 s
0/100
25%
Value11.2 s
5/100
10%
Value120 ms
97/100
30%
Value0.791
5/100
15%
Value11.0 s
20/100
10%
2852 ms
276 ms
281 ms
188 ms
189 ms
Our browser made a total of 92 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 84% of them (77 requests) were addressed to the original Yagm.ru, 5% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Ajax.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.9 sec) belongs to the original domain Yagm.ru.
Page size can be reduced by 725.5 kB (51%)
1.4 MB
684.6 kB
In fact, the total size of Yagm.ru main page is 1.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 723.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 26.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 4.3 kB, which is 12% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 26.8 kB or 77% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 40.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Yagm images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 522.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 522.4 kB or 72% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 135.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Yagm.ru needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 135.4 kB or 85% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 33 (40%)
82
49
The browser has sent 82 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Yagm. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 20 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 15 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
yagm.ru
2852 ms
k2.css
276 ms
default_div.css
281 ms
modal.css
188 ms
jcemediabox.css
189 ms
style.css
189 ms
colorbox.css
190 ms
style.css
283 ms
style.css
283 ms
mootools-core.js
563 ms
core.js
286 ms
jquery.min.js
34 ms
k2.js
365 ms
jquery-1.10.1.min.js
365 ms
jquery-noconflict.js
373 ms
jquery.media.js
464 ms
functions.js
591 ms
validateForm.js
455 ms
mootools-more.js
923 ms
modal.js
463 ms
jcemediabox.js
728 ms
jquery.colorbox-min.js
555 ms
jquery.form.js
650 ms
jquery.simpleform.js
650 ms
engine.js
650 ms
system.css
652 ms
general.css
742 ms
css
27 ms
template.css
961 ms
template.responsive.css
742 ms
css
36 ms
jquery.js
969 ms
script.js
905 ms
script.responsive.js
833 ms
system.css
94 ms
webfont.js
35 ms
3_1_FFFFFFFF_EFEFEFFF_0_pageviews
298 ms
246891
375 ms
pageglare.png
118 ms
header.jpg
118 ms
object1091714374.png
118 ms
yagm_2.jpg
119 ms
adres.png
119 ms
mail.png
120 ms
tel.png
292 ms
men_015_bg.jpg
294 ms
menu_015_h_pointer.jpg
292 ms
UGB_950_12.jpg
297 ms
______________________________________Endress_ESE_604_DYS_ES_80_979182.jpg
297 ms
______________________________________ESE_804_SDBS_DC2.jpg
292 ms
3c444a0dcfaac2a6056ec4230266c6f3.jpg
295 ms
__________________1_STV50_X_012.jpg
295 ms
_____________________________2.jpg
297 ms
___________________________2.jpg
297 ms
_________________________3.jpg
365 ms
_____________________________________2.jpg
372 ms
_________________________________2.jpg
374 ms
_____________________2.jpg
372 ms
tochka1.jpg
374 ms
__________2.jpg
376 ms
____________2.jpg
455 ms
__________________2.jpg
464 ms
nzgu.jpg
467 ms
abac-logo1.gif
465 ms
aet_logo90.gif
464 ms
bw-logo.jpg
469 ms
endress-logo.gif
548 ms
ewm-logo.jpg
557 ms
fubag-logo.jpg
555 ms
logo_Kerona.jpg
558 ms
logo-blue-small.gif
559 ms
logo-koshin.gif
563 ms
matrix.jpg
638 ms
resanta.jpg
627 ms
LKf8nhXsWg5ybwEGXk8UBQ.woff
65 ms
yrzXiAvgeQQdopyG8QSg8Q.woff
234 ms
g46X4VH_KHOWAAa-HpnGPhsxEYwM7FgeyaSgU71cLG0.woff
234 ms
lILlYDvubYemzYzN7GbLkIraN7vELC11_xip9Rz-hMs.woff
234 ms
7dSh6BcuqDLzS2qAASIeuj8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
235 ms
watch.js
236 ms
hit
262 ms
popup.html
541 ms
tooltip.html
543 ms
skat.PNG
541 ms
balt.JPG
546 ms
searchicon.png
618 ms
zakazzvonok.jpg
627 ms
overlay.png
459 ms
border.png
460 ms
controls.png
460 ms
watch.js
1599 ms
59.gif
272 ms
yagm.ru accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
yagm.ru best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
yagm.ru SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
RU
RU
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Yagm.ru can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Russian is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Yagm.ru main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
yagm.ru
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Yagm. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: