Tools & Wizards About Us
zigil.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 40

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    60% of other websites

  • 76

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 43% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 99

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    93% of websites

zigil.com

zigil.com is a premium domain and is currently available for sale, we are willing to speak with you regarding pricing.

Page Load Speed

1.3 sec in total

First Response

189 ms

Resources Loaded

1 sec

Page Rendered

113 ms

zigil.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to zigil.com homepage info - get ready to check Zigil best content right away, or after learning these important things about zigil.com

Visit zigil.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Zigil.com page load time and found that the first response time was 189 ms and then it took 1.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

zigil.com performance score

40

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.4 s

37/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.7 s

7/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.8 s

66/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value460 ms

62/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.319

36/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value8.3 s

40/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

zigil.com

189 ms

jquery.min.js

44 ms

bh.php

66 ms

cf.php

117 ms

adframe.js

67 ms

Our browser made a total of 33 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 48% of them (16 requests) were addressed to the original Zigil.com, 12% (4 requests) were made to T1.gstatic.com and 9% (3 requests) were made to T2.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (335 ms) relates to the external source Dp.g.doubleclick.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 9.5 kB (7%)

Content Size

127.2 kB

After Optimization

117.7 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Zigil.com main page is 127.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 86.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-37%

Potential reduce by 406 B

  • Original 1.1 kB
  • After minification 1.1 kB
  • After compression 682 B

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 406 B or 37% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-9%

Potential reduce by 3.0 kB

  • Original 32.1 kB
  • After minification 29.2 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Zigil images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 138 B

  • Original 86.3 kB
  • After minification 86.3 kB
  • After compression 86.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 6.0 kB

  • Original 7.7 kB
  • After minification 4.4 kB
  • After compression 1.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Zigil.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 6.0 kB or 78% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 12 (44%)

Requests Now

27

After Optimization

15

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 27 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Zigil. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

zigil.com

zigil.com

189 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

44 ms

bh.php

bh.php

66 ms

cf.php

cf.php

117 ms

adframe.js

adframe.js

67 ms

master.css

master.css

69 ms

960.css

960.css

70 ms

71 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

4 ms

caf.js

caf.js

74 ms

caf.js

caf.js

43 ms

reset.css

reset.css

36 ms

caf.gif

caf.gif

31 ms

bg_springmorning_01.png

bg_springmorning_01.png

72 ms

fs_banner_grd.png

fs_banner_grd.png

68 ms

male_names.jpg

male_names.jpg

113 ms

leftcap_springmorning_01.png

leftcap_springmorning_01.png

68 ms

rightcap_springmorning_01.png

rightcap_springmorning_01.png

70 ms

101_search_bg.png

101_search_bg.png

70 ms

footer_slice_gradient.png

footer_slice_gradient.png

133 ms

slave.html

slave.html

6 ms

domainpark.cgi

domainpark.cgi

335 ms

favicon

favicon

26 ms

favicon

favicon

19 ms

favicon

favicon

28 ms

favicon

favicon

34 ms

chevron-white.png

chevron-white.png

9 ms

favicon

favicon

19 ms

favicon

favicon

20 ms

favicon

favicon

25 ms

favicon

favicon

18 ms

favicon

favicon

170 ms

favicon

favicon

15 ms

Accessibility Review

zigil.com accessibility score

76

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

zigil.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

zigil.com SEO score

99

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Zigil.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Zigil.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

zigil.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Zigil. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: