Tools & Wizards About Us
ziprider.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 75

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    84% of other websites

  • 96

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 89% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    75% of websites

ziprider.com

ZipRider, a zipline construction company

Page Load Speed

2.1 sec in total

First Response

384 ms

Resources Loaded

1.2 sec

Page Rendered

500 ms

ziprider.com screenshot

About Website

Visit ziprider.com now to see the best up-to-date Zip Rider content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about ziprider.com

Ziprider, we don't just build zip lines, we create a whole new mountain experience

Visit ziprider.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Ziprider.com page load time and found that the first response time was 384 ms and then it took 1.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

ziprider.com performance score

75

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.5 s

95/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.0 s

13/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.9 s

95/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value40 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.009

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value4.8 s

79/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

ziprider.com

384 ms

all.css

558 ms

logo.png

150 ms

u34gDjalIIA

124 ms

home.jpg

811 ms

Our browser made a total of 21 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 48% of them (10 requests) were addressed to the original Ziprider.com, 14% (3 requests) were made to S.ytimg.com and 10% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (811 ms) belongs to the original domain Ziprider.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 542.3 kB (75%)

Content Size

727.7 kB

After Optimization

185.4 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Ziprider.com main page is 727.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 395.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-67%

Potential reduce by 8.8 kB

  • Original 13.1 kB
  • After minification 12.4 kB
  • After compression 4.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 8.8 kB or 67% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 1 B

  • Original 5.0 kB
  • After minification 5.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Zip Rider images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-64%

Potential reduce by 199.8 kB

  • Original 314.2 kB
  • After minification 311.3 kB
  • After compression 114.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 199.8 kB or 64% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 333.7 kB

  • Original 395.4 kB
  • After minification 362.4 kB
  • After compression 61.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ziprider.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 333.7 kB or 84% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 8 (53%)

Requests Now

15

After Optimization

7

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 15 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Zip Rider. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 9 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

ziprider.com

ziprider.com

384 ms

all.css

all.css

558 ms

logo.png

logo.png

150 ms

u34gDjalIIA

u34gDjalIIA

124 ms

home.jpg

home.jpg

811 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

90 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

523 ms

popovers.js

popovers.js

248 ms

owl.carousel.min.js

owl.carousel.min.js

522 ms

www-embed-player-vflfNyN_r.css

www-embed-player-vflfNyN_r.css

64 ms

www-embed-player.js

www-embed-player.js

86 ms

base.js

base.js

177 ms

Tqng9ngJVK4Gqvh3e602hP-HqlN49KFEUSDtmrOPmWo.js

Tqng9ngJVK4Gqvh3e602hP-HqlN49KFEUSDtmrOPmWo.js

98 ms

ad_status.js

ad_status.js

115 ms

interstate-light-webfont.woff

interstate-light-webfont.woff

122 ms

biondisanslt-webfont.woff

biondisanslt-webfont.woff

155 ms

pfdindisplaypro-thin-webfont.woff

pfdindisplaypro-thin-webfont.woff

123 ms

2UX7WLTfW3W8TclTUvlFyQ.woff

2UX7WLTfW3W8TclTUvlFyQ.woff

75 ms

RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUT8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff

RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUT8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff

103 ms

ga.js

ga.js

58 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

20 ms

Accessibility Review

ziprider.com accessibility score

96

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

ziprider.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

ziprider.com SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ziprider.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Ziprider.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

ziprider.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Zip Rider. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: