5.7 sec in total
1.5 sec
4 sec
225 ms
Welcome to zoo.ad homepage info - get ready to check Zoo best content right away, or after learning these important things about zoo.ad
Zoo Studio, Estudi de Disseny Gràfic a Barcelona. Oferim serveis de Identitat Corporativa, Editorial, Packaging, Disseny Web, Multimèdia i Audiovisuals.
Visit zoo.adWe analyzed Zoo.ad page load time and found that the first response time was 1.5 sec and then it took 4.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
zoo.ad performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value6.4 s
2/100
10%
Value7.9 s
3/100
25%
Value9.8 s
10/100
10%
Value470 ms
61/100
30%
Value0.116
85/100
15%
Value7.9 s
43/100
10%
1486 ms
8 ms
228 ms
241 ms
793 ms
Our browser made a total of 62 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 95% of them (59 requests) were addressed to the original Zoo.ad, 3% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Yui.yahooapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Zoo.ad.
Page size can be reduced by 102.9 kB (15%)
670.6 kB
567.7 kB
In fact, the total size of Zoo.ad main page is 670.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 621.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 26.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 26.6 kB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 76.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Zoo needs image optimization as it can save up to 76.3 kB or 12% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 34 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Number of requests can be reduced by 12 (20%)
61
49
The browser has sent 61 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Zoo. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 9 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
zoo.ad
1486 ms
reset-min.css
8 ms
estil.css
228 ms
twocol.css
241 ms
jquery-1.7.1.min.js
793 ms
jquery.history.js
366 ms
jquery.desaturate.js
482 ms
jquery.scrollTo-1.4.2-min.js
256 ms
jquery.lazyload-1.7.0.min.js
328 ms
jquery.cookie.js
362 ms
jquery.cookiecuttr.js
607 ms
cookiecuttr.css
435 ms
zoojs.js
459 ms
ga.js
57 ms
zoo_studio.png
133 ms
icona_graella.png
176 ms
icona_projectes.png
126 ms
icones_social.png
212 ms
icona_new.png
117 ms
thumb.jpg
155 ms
thumb.jpg
439 ms
thumb.jpg
507 ms
thumb.jpg
491 ms
thumb.jpg
280 ms
thumb.jpg
660 ms
thumb.jpg
527 ms
thumb.jpg
403 ms
thumb.jpg
516 ms
thumb.jpg
667 ms
thumb.jpg
736 ms
thumb.jpg
800 ms
thumb.jpg
649 ms
thumb.jpg
901 ms
thumb.jpg
768 ms
thumb.jpg
808 ms
thumb.jpg
891 ms
thumb.jpg
870 ms
thumb.jpg
882 ms
thumb.jpg
1079 ms
thumb.jpg
942 ms
thumb.jpg
1008 ms
thumb.jpg
1069 ms
thumb.jpg
1042 ms
thumb.jpg
1026 ms
thumb.jpg
1102 ms
thumb.jpg
1134 ms
thumb.jpg
1154 ms
thumb.jpg
1190 ms
thumb.jpg
1212 ms
thumb.jpg
1201 ms
__utm.gif
12 ms
thumb.jpg
1114 ms
thumb.jpg
1150 ms
thumb.jpg
1143 ms
thumb.jpg
1136 ms
thumb.jpg
1170 ms
thumb.jpg
1120 ms
thumb.jpg
1068 ms
thumb.jpg
1177 ms
thumb.jpg
1074 ms
thumb.jpg
921 ms
onecol.css
125 ms
zoo.ad accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
zoo.ad best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
zoo.ad SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
CA
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Zoo.ad can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Catalan is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Zoo.ad main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
zoo.ad
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Zoo. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: