23.2 sec in total
651 ms
17.1 sec
5.4 sec
Welcome to 160by2.com homepage info - get ready to check 160 By 2 best content for India right away, or after learning these important things about 160by2.com
Generated by create next app
Visit 160by2.comWe analyzed 160by2.com page load time and found that the first response time was 651 ms and then it took 22.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only a small number of websites can load faster.
160by2.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.7 s
5/100
10%
Value11.5 s
0/100
25%
Value8.6 s
17/100
10%
Value620 ms
48/100
30%
Value0.01
100/100
15%
Value11.1 s
20/100
10%
651 ms
591 ms
1327 ms
1477 ms
653 ms
Our browser made a total of 35 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 23% of them (8 requests) were addressed to the original 160by2.com, 14% (5 requests) were made to Tpc.googlesyndication.com and 11% (4 requests) were made to Cdn.adhigh.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.9 sec) relates to the external source Cdn.adhigh.net.
Page size can be reduced by 603.9 kB (51%)
1.2 MB
574.6 kB
In fact, the total size of 160by2.com main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 824.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 16.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 4.0 kB, which is 18% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 16.9 kB or 74% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 14.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. 160 By 2 images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 524.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 524.6 kB or 64% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 48.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. 160by2.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 48.0 kB or 85% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 23 (70%)
33
10
The browser has sent 33 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of 160 By 2. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 24 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.160by2.com
651 ms
adRecover.js
591 ms
160by2_styles.css
1327 ms
jquery.js
1477 ms
gpt.js
653 ms
jquery.min.js
79 ms
block.jpg
241 ms
feedback
58 ms
SessionCheck
687 ms
gpt.js
487 ms
sp_out.png
589 ms
pubads_impl_147.js
578 ms
OpenSans-Regular-webfont.woff
879 ms
ads
258 ms
container.html
33 ms
fo_v01_index.js
519 ms
container.html
413 ms
osd.js
394 ms
fm_v01_index.js
368 ms
m.js
3882 ms
p.js
3859 ms
m_window_focus_non_hydra.js
2998 ms
osd_listener.js
3858 ms
ext.js
3857 ms
analytics.js
492 ms
collect
1483 ms
v.js
48 ms
ua-parser.min.js
876 ms
imp.js
381 ms
ac
797 ms
sas-browser.js
192 ms
sas-dom.js
153 ms
sas-banner-2.4.js
32 ms
aniview.js
630 ms
track
617 ms
160by2.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
ARIA IDs are not unique
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
160by2.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
160by2.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
N/A
N/A
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise 160by2.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that 160by2.com main page’s claimed encoding is . Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.
160by2.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of 160 By 2. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: