Tools & Wizards About Us
1632.org screenshot

Report Summary

  • 73

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    83% of other websites

  • 84

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 57% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    81% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    95% of websites

1632.org

Eric Flint's 1632 Universe Compendium | 1632.org

Page Load Speed

616 ms in total

First Response

95 ms

Resources Loaded

267 ms

Page Rendered

254 ms

1632.org screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing 1632 content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about 1632.org

The definitive resource for information related to Eric Flint's 1632 series, including stylesheets and manuscript submission guides for prospective authors.

Visit 1632.org

Key Findings

We analyzed 1632.org page load time and found that the first response time was 95 ms and then it took 521 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only 5% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

1632.org performance score

73

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.2 s

79/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.4 s

92/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.4 s

56/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value410 ms

66/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.158

73/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value6.5 s

58/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

1632.org

95 ms

common.css

59 ms

newhomepage.css

62 ms

1632cover-152x240.jpg

64 ms

Eric.jpg

59 ms

Our browser made a total of 10 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to 1632.org and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (112 ms) belongs to the original domain 1632.org.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 20.0 kB (24%)

Content Size

84.8 kB

After Optimization

64.8 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of 1632.org main page is 84.8 kB. This result falls within a vast category (top 1 000 000) of heavyweight, probably not optimized, and thus slow loading web pages. Only 5% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 64.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-65%

Potential reduce by 8.8 kB

  • Original 13.6 kB
  • After minification 12.7 kB
  • After compression 4.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 8.8 kB or 65% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-10%

Potential reduce by 6.6 kB

  • Original 64.7 kB
  • After minification 58.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. 1632 images are well optimized though.

CSS Optimization

-70%

Potential reduce by 4.5 kB

  • Original 6.5 kB
  • After minification 5.4 kB
  • After compression 1.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. 1632.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 4.5 kB or 70% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

9

After Optimization

9

  • Images
  • CSS

The browser has sent 9 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of 1632. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Network Requests Diagram

1632.org

1632.org

95 ms

common.css

common.css

59 ms

newhomepage.css

newhomepage.css

62 ms

1632cover-152x240.jpg

1632cover-152x240.jpg

64 ms

Eric.jpg

Eric.jpg

59 ms

gg-trans-432x48.png

gg-trans-432x48.png

112 ms

Background.jpg

Background.jpg

59 ms

LogoSmall-175x94.gif

LogoSmall-175x94.gif

60 ms

1632_Buy_Stuff-206x200.gif

1632_Buy_Stuff-206x200.gif

91 ms

Pickup-20x18.gif

Pickup-20x18.gif

62 ms

Accessibility Review

1632.org accessibility score

84

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

1632.org best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

1632.org SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    N/A

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise 1632.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that 1632.org main page’s claimed encoding is . Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

1632.org

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of 1632. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: