Report Summary

  • 97

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    95% of other websites

  • 96

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 89% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    81% of websites

  • 83

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    46% of websites

Page Load Speed

5.8 sec in total

First Response

543 ms

Resources Loaded

5.2 sec

Page Rendered

105 ms

168.estate screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing 168 content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about 168.estate

To rent or to buy a property with an agency, any individual has to pay a fee. Is it possible to decrease it and allow document processing online for the customer? 168 Estate Limited moved real estate ...

Visit 168.estate

Key Findings

We analyzed 168.estate page load time and found that the first response time was 543 ms and then it took 5.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

168.estate performance score

97

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.9 s

86/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value1.9 s

98/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.0 s

94/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value30 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value2.0 s

99/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

168.estate

543 ms

168.estate

1021 ms

f6176a72.main.css

503 ms

ab3a65f3.vendor.js

2444 ms

70239279.app.js

1010 ms

Our browser made a total of 34 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 59% of them (20 requests) were addressed to the original 168.estate, 12% (4 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 9% (3 requests) were made to Static.addtoany.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.4 sec) belongs to the original domain 168.estate.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 455.6 kB (69%)

Content Size

659.0 kB

After Optimization

203.4 kB

In fact, the total size of 168.estate main page is 659.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 378.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 46.5 kB

  • Original 57.4 kB
  • After minification 56.5 kB
  • After compression 10.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 46.5 kB or 81% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-56%

Potential reduce by 125.3 kB

  • Original 223.5 kB
  • After minification 223.3 kB
  • After compression 98.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 125.3 kB or 56% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-75%

Potential reduce by 283.8 kB

  • Original 378.2 kB
  • After minification 352.2 kB
  • After compression 94.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. 168.estate needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 283.8 kB or 75% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 18 (58%)

Requests Now

31

After Optimization

13

The browser has sent 31 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of 168. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 10 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

168.estate accessibility score

96

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't have a <title> element

Best Practices

168.estate best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

SEO Factors

168.estate SEO score

83

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't have a <title> element

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise 168.estate can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that 168.estate main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of 168. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: