Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 0

    Accessibility

  • 0

    Best Practices

  • 0

    SEO

1860.is

Iupilon | Sample & Fine. These are your new lifestyles.

Page Load Speed

3 sec in total

First Response

474 ms

Resources Loaded

1.9 sec

Page Rendered

622 ms

1860.is screenshot

About Website

Visit 1860.is now to see the best up-to-date 1860 content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about 1860.is

Dedicated to providing you with quality home products and information, Iupilon offers only the best in terms of products and information. Simple and fine, our missions are designed to ensure that your...

Visit 1860.is

Key Findings

We analyzed 1860.is page load time and found that the first response time was 474 ms and then it took 2.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

1860.is performance score

0

Network Requests Diagram

1860.is

474 ms

pre_tumblelog.js

10 ms

styles.css

28 ms

jplayer.blue.monday.css

34 ms

jquery.fancybox-1.3.4.css

28 ms

Our browser made a total of 118 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original 1860.is, 20% (24 requests) were made to Static.tumblr.com and 16% (19 requests) were made to Static.xx.fbcdn.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (538 ms) relates to the external source Api.soundcloud.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.2 MB (53%)

Content Size

2.2 MB

After Optimization

1.0 MB

In fact, the total size of 1860.is main page is 2.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 1.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 76.1 kB

  • Original 93.3 kB
  • After minification 69.2 kB
  • After compression 17.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 24.1 kB, which is 26% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 76.1 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 10.9 kB

  • Original 433.5 kB
  • After minification 422.6 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. 1860 images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-68%

Potential reduce by 702.9 kB

  • Original 1.0 MB
  • After minification 1.0 MB
  • After compression 329.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 702.9 kB or 68% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-60%

Potential reduce by 393.5 kB

  • Original 654.2 kB
  • After minification 637.7 kB
  • After compression 260.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. 1860.is needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 393.5 kB or 60% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 62 (57%)

Requests Now

109

After Optimization

47

The browser has sent 109 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of 1860. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 41 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 13 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

SEO Factors

1860.is SEO score

0

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise 1860.is can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that 1860.is main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of 1860. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: