7.1 sec in total
2.7 sec
4.1 sec
330 ms
Welcome to 1960sfashionstyle.com homepage info - get ready to check 1960 Sfashionstyle best content right away, or after learning these important things about 1960sfashionstyle.com
Blog about fashion in the 1960s, in particual 60s fashion for women and 60s style tips
Visit 1960sfashionstyle.comWe analyzed 1960sfashionstyle.com page load time and found that the first response time was 2.7 sec and then it took 4.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
1960sfashionstyle.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.8 s
57/100
10%
Value3.3 s
69/100
25%
Value2.8 s
96/100
10%
Value30 ms
100/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value3.2 s
95/100
10%
2660 ms
21 ms
312 ms
209 ms
405 ms
Our browser made a total of 88 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 66% of them (58 requests) were addressed to the original 1960sfashionstyle.com, 14% (12 requests) were made to S-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.7 sec) belongs to the original domain 1960sfashionstyle.com.
Page size can be reduced by 524.6 kB (48%)
1.1 MB
579.8 kB
In fact, the total size of 1960sfashionstyle.com main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 450.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 41.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 41.9 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. 1960 Sfashionstyle images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 291.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 291.6 kB or 65% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 189.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. 1960sfashionstyle.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 189.8 kB or 76% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 58 (68%)
85
27
The browser has sent 85 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of 1960 Sfashionstyle. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 36 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 19 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
1960sfashionstyle.com
2660 ms
ga.js
21 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
312 ms
mypinterest.css
209 ms
dashicons.min.css
405 ms
thickbox.css
211 ms
wppepvn_libs.min.css
209 ms
frontend.min.css
290 ms
font-awesome.css
313 ms
style-front_end.css
312 ms
templates.css
507 ms
lockers.css
397 ms
css.css
415 ms
pagenavi-css.css
413 ms
tipsy.css
411 ms
wp-shortcode.css
500 ms
style.css
603 ms
flexslider.css
515 ms
font-awesome.min.css
611 ms
responsive.css
518 ms
__utm.gif
11 ms
ytprefs.min.css
531 ms
mypinterest.js
531 ms
jquery.js
833 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
546 ms
jquery-ui.min.js
627 ms
json2.js
635 ms
jstorage.js
635 ms
front_end_h.js
633 ms
plusone.js
60 ms
js.min.js
647 ms
customscript.js
728 ms
jquery.flexslider-min.js
737 ms
jquery.tipsy.js
735 ms
wp-shortcode.js
734 ms
ytprefs.min.js
752 ms
script.js
886 ms
css
34 ms
core.min.js
833 ms
widget.min.js
838 ms
tabs.min.js
838 ms
mouse.min.js
815 ms
slider.min.js
890 ms
jquery.plugins.min.js
888 ms
wppepvn_libs.min.js
820 ms
frontend.min.js
803 ms
jquery.adrotate.clicktracker.js
804 ms
fitvids.min.js
800 ms
wp-embed.min.js
792 ms
sticky.js
786 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
56 ms
iframe_api
103 ms
ti.js
98 ms
ti.js
96 ms
300-250_06.jpg
88 ms
652a5c430cb7c5ac1593eb51d2bd3b92.jpg
130 ms
nobg.png
287 ms
60s-style-dresses-the-3-most-popular-shapes-203x150.jpg
285 ms
shopstyle-creates-a-modern-twist-in-your-shopping-experience-203x150.jpg
284 ms
1960s-vintage-dresses-203x150.jpg
285 ms
how-to-wear-a-60s-head-scarf-203x150.jpg
297 ms
c134c637d7df0bbc_640_vintage-clothes-203x150.jpg
296 ms
1960s-glasses-styles-203x150.jpg
322 ms
1960s-style-bridesmaid-dresses-203x150.jpg
321 ms
1960s-hippie-fashion-history-203x150.jpg
324 ms
1960s-womens-fashion-in-britain-203x150.jpg
325 ms
pinit.png
402 ms
b64f1c0a4da50d557d76ba6278ff9c75.jpg
122 ms
c38aa628d48f797c3251ef30d8fe3ab4.jpg
141 ms
cb1ff4040a00aa04adcb5d0a991bde95.jpg
143 ms
49206377c95571a49cac15c759c5e5c6.jpg
139 ms
8a885289c80be2e08cc8de90e28cde41.jpg
141 ms
6150fab8193be52cbcca6a9017c6a6bd.jpg
172 ms
605e6b20018ad03f03f93895ec580081.jpg
141 ms
7f1ed4261208c16691ea5727598f176c.jpg
138 ms
cc73f8969f2073b4e7a3f5d55fb421cf.jpg
163 ms
9502f34984cbc783a57220226eb46bab.jpg
130 ms
568779be32a924754680d1f328a9a902.jpg
132 ms
9L3hIJMPCf6sxCltnxd6X5bko4ywDBcg2f1uYutDOWY.woff
45 ms
FG9R9aX-RIX_AvJI8USOWg.woff
58 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
515 ms
p
85 ms
dWke_Kq9qr5lQhacwqm_6r.js
53 ms
www-widgetapi.js
44 ms
v2
52 ms
dpx
11 ms
ca.png
167 ms
xrefid.xgi
30 ms
1960sfashionstyle.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
1960sfashionstyle.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
1960sfashionstyle.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
N/A
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise 1960sfashionstyle.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that 1960sfashionstyle.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
1960sfashionstyle.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of 1960 Sfashionstyle. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: