Report Summary

  • 57

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    73% of other websites

  • 100

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 97% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 91

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    70% of websites

1v1.fail

1v1.LOL | Building Simulator, Battle Royale & Shooting Game

Page Load Speed

642 ms in total

First Response

70 ms

Resources Loaded

477 ms

Page Rendered

95 ms

1v1.fail screenshot

About Website

Visit 1v1.fail now to see the best up-to-date 1 V content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about 1v1.fail

Discover 1v1, the online building simulator & third person shooting game. Battle royale, build fight, box fight, zone wars and more game modes to enjoy!

Visit 1v1.fail

Key Findings

We analyzed 1v1.fail page load time and found that the first response time was 70 ms and then it took 572 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 10% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

1v1.fail performance score

57

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.4 s

37/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value10.3 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.8 s

49/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value40 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.104

89/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value7.1 s

52/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

1v1.fail

70 ms

js

135 ms

googleAnalytics.js

34 ms

jquery.min.js

105 ms

mobileRedirect.js

80 ms

Our browser made a total of 23 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 61% of them (14 requests) were addressed to the original 1v1.fail, 22% (5 requests) were made to Gstatic.com and 4% (1 request) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (260 ms) relates to the external source Gstatic.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 15.7 kB (5%)

Content Size

339.1 kB

After Optimization

323.4 kB

In fact, the total size of 1v1.fail main page is 339.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 308.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-73%

Potential reduce by 10.7 kB

  • Original 14.8 kB
  • After minification 13.9 kB
  • After compression 4.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 10.7 kB or 73% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 15.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization.

JavaScript Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 5.0 kB

  • Original 308.6 kB
  • After minification 308.6 kB
  • After compression 303.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 19 (86%)

Requests Now

22

After Optimization

3

The browser has sent 22 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of 1 V. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 20 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

1v1.fail accessibility score

100

Accessibility Issues

Best Practices

1v1.fail best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

1v1.fail SEO score

91

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise 1v1.fail can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that 1v1.fail main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of 1 V. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: