Report Summary

  • 47

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    66% of other websites

  • 55

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 23% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 83

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    46% of websites

Page Load Speed

16.1 sec in total

First Response

703 ms

Resources Loaded

14.7 sec

Page Rendered

744 ms

260555.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to 260555.com homepage info - get ready to check 260555 best content right away, or after learning these important things about 260555.com

香港博彩网:本站为您免费提供大量六合彩搅珠数据分析,力图打造成为最专业的曾道人特码论坛,提供最精准的六合彩白小姐特码,致力于研究香港赛马会,开奖结果,六合彩资料,六合彩特码,六合彩论坛,六合彩网站,六合彩公司,香港6合彩,六和彩,黄大仙,天线宝宝,六合彩开奖,6合彩,六合王,香港六合采,liuhecai,六合彩开奖记录,xianggangliuhecai,六合彩官方网,资助各项社会慈善公益,打击地...

Visit 260555.com

Key Findings

We analyzed 260555.com page load time and found that the first response time was 703 ms and then it took 15.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

260555.com performance score

47

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.8 s

56/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.9 s

14/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value9.8 s

10/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value200 ms

90/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.499

16/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value5.0 s

77/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

260555.com

703 ms

lhsdBg.gif

320 ms

lhsd1.gif

424 ms

kj.htm

141 ms

bbs.htm

774 ms

Our browser made a total of 39 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 49% of them (19 requests) were addressed to the original 260555.com, 26% (10 requests) were made to 9047.com and 8% (3 requests) were made to 08111.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (10.2 sec) relates to the external source Count10.51yes.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 39.4 kB (17%)

Content Size

236.6 kB

After Optimization

197.2 kB

In fact, the total size of 260555.com main page is 236.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 15% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 146.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-63%

Potential reduce by 21.0 kB

  • Original 33.4 kB
  • After minification 32.1 kB
  • After compression 12.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 21.0 kB or 63% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 3.0 kB

  • Original 146.0 kB
  • After minification 143.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. 260555 images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-27%

Potential reduce by 15.4 kB

  • Original 57.1 kB
  • After minification 57.1 kB
  • After compression 41.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 15.4 kB or 27% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 8 (22%)

Requests Now

37

After Optimization

29

The browser has sent 37 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of 260555. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

260555.com accessibility score

55

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

260555.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

260555.com SEO score

83

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    ZH

  • Encoding

    GB2312

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise 260555.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is Chinese. Our system also found out that 260555.com main page’s claimed encoding is gb2312. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of 260555. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: