5 sec in total
513 ms
4.1 sec
332 ms
Click here to check amazing 26 Jan 2016 Images content for India. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about 26jan2016images.in
Visit 26jan2016images.inWe analyzed 26jan2016images.in page load time and found that the first response time was 513 ms and then it took 4.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster. This domain responded with an error, which can significantly jeopardize 26jan2016images.in rating and web reputation
26jan2016images.in performance score
513 ms
985 ms
11 ms
16 ms
8 ms
Our browser made a total of 107 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original 26jan2016images.in, 50% (54 requests) were made to Banjart.com and 24% (26 requests) were made to Maps.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.4 sec) relates to the external source Banjart.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.9 MB (65%)
2.9 MB
1.0 MB
In fact, the total size of 26jan2016images.in main page is 2.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. CSS take 1.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 65.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 65.8 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 19.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. 26 Jan 2016 Images images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 612.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 612.0 kB or 69% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.2 MB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. 26jan2016images.in needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 1.2 MB or 92% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 48 (53%)
91
43
The browser has sent 91 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of 26 Jan 2016 Images. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 29 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 14 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
26jan2016images.in
513 ms
www.banjart.com
985 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
11 ms
styles.css
16 ms
shortcodes.css
8 ms
ish-fontello.css
32 ms
style.css
35 ms
tooltipster.css
30 ms
main-options.css
15 ms
main-options_2.css
21 ms
jquery.fancybox.css
33 ms
mediaelementplayer.min.css
31 ms
wp-mediaelement.css
38 ms
css
83 ms
css
89 ms
js_composer.css
39 ms
jquery.js
81 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
37 ms
packery.pkgd.min.js
80 ms
imagesloaded.pkgd.min.js
80 ms
jquery.scrollTo-1.4.3.1-min.js
79 ms
comment-reply.min.js
499 ms
jquery.form.min.js
81 ms
scripts.js
83 ms
widgets.js
82 ms
jquery.fancybox.pack.js
84 ms
ish_jquery.tooltipster.min.js
83 ms
main.js
84 ms
js_composer_front.js
747 ms
js
85 ms
tweetMachine.js
167 ms
jquery.jribbble.min.js
168 ms
analytics.js
22 ms
solid-light-escheresque.png
21 ms
solid-light-cream-pixels.png
19 ms
wordpress-logo.png
21 ms
ish-spinner.svg
484 ms
card_shop_qualifier-571x380.jpg
1032 ms
EA_FEST_2013-571x380.jpg
1030 ms
photography_day_2013-571x380.jpg
503 ms
card-571x428.jpg
1357 ms
04-571x380.jpg
1440 ms
LOGO-571x422.jpg
1226 ms
camera.svg
1085 ms
suitcase2.svg
1455 ms
clapboard.svg
1457 ms
screen.svg
1811 ms
brush-pencil.svg
1708 ms
globe2.svg
1817 ms
hexagon_rounded-glow-bg.svg
1920 ms
newpaper.svg
1948 ms
card_shop_qualifier-200x200.jpg
1460 ms
EA_FEST_2013-200x200.jpg
1470 ms
photography_day_2013-200x200.jpg
1473 ms
card-200x200.jpg
1475 ms
04-200x200.jpg
1478 ms
LOGO-200x200.jpg
1479 ms
collect
29 ms
DvlFBScY1r-FMtZSYIYoYw.ttf
9 ms
v0SdcGFAl2aezM9Vq_aFTQ.ttf
27 ms
ish-fontello.woff
2363 ms
OsJ2DjdpjqFRVUSto6IffKCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
27 ms
2Q-AW1e_taO6pHwMXcXW5w.ttf
28 ms
0ihfXUL2emPh0ROJezvraKCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
29 ms
ISUraQdBYMI3VoDzBxXqNvesZW2xOQ-xsNqO47m55DA.ttf
28 ms
OMD20Sg9RTs7sUORCEN-7Z0EAVxt0G0biEntp43Qt6E.ttf
28 ms
infobox_packed.js
1572 ms
common.js
86 ms
map.js
85 ms
util.js
86 ms
marker.js
85 ms
139 ms
onion.js
33 ms
76 ms
ViewportInfoService.GetViewportInfo
118 ms
stats.js
47 ms
controls.js
38 ms
transparent.png
63 ms
css
67 ms
google4.png
72 ms
mapcnt6.png
38 ms
sv5.png
41 ms
tmapctrl.png
17 ms
cb_scout5.png
27 ms
tmapctrl4.png
34 ms
imgs8.png
27 ms
vt
88 ms
vt
87 ms
vt
84 ms
vt
85 ms
vt
82 ms
vt
84 ms
vt
87 ms
vt
86 ms
vt
88 ms
vt
89 ms
vt
89 ms
vt
89 ms
vt
91 ms
vt
90 ms
vt
92 ms
vt
92 ms
zN7GBFwfMP4uA6AR0HCoLQ.ttf
10 ms
RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
9 ms
Hgo13k-tfSpn0qi1SFdUfaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
9 ms
d-6IYplOFocCacKzxwXSOKCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
10 ms
AuthenticationService.Authenticate
123 ms
26jan2016images.in SEO score
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise 26jan2016images.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that 26jan2016images.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
26jan2016images.in
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of 26 Jan 2016 Images. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: