15.9 sec in total
1.6 sec
11.4 sec
2.8 sec
Click here to check amazing 2 Handbags content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about 2handbags.com
Premium Brands All Brands
Visit 2handbags.comWe analyzed 2handbags.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.6 sec and then it took 14.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.
2handbags.com performance score
1625 ms
947 ms
637 ms
1313 ms
1914 ms
Our browser made a total of 61 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 84% of them (51 requests) were addressed to the original 2handbags.com, 7% (4 requests) were made to Maps.google.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Maxcdn.bootstrapcdn.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (5.4 sec) belongs to the original domain 2handbags.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.2 MB (62%)
2.0 MB
770.4 kB
In fact, the total size of 2handbags.com main page is 2.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 844.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 47.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 47.6 kB or 75% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 0 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. 2 Handbags images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 559.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 559.2 kB or 66% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 640.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. 2handbags.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 640.7 kB or 84% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 49 (88%)
56
7
The browser has sent 56 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of 2 Handbags. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 38 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 13 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
2handbags.com
1625 ms
cloudflare.min.js
947 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
637 ms
gd_core_frontend.css
1313 ms
font-awesome.min.css
1914 ms
styles.css
1565 ms
style.css
1233 ms
geodir-location.css
1645 ms
style.min.css
1646 ms
font-awesome.css
1279 ms
ilightbox.css
1498 ms
animations.css
1445 ms
fusion-shortcodes.min.css
1586 ms
avada-7.css
2068 ms
css
2524 ms
jquery.js
2522 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
2066 ms
frontend.min.js
2521 ms
geodirectory.min.js
2066 ms
js
2521 ms
chosen.jquery.min.js
2020 ms
ajax-chosen.min.js
3349 ms
marker_cluster.js
3383 ms
pto.css
3349 ms
jquery.form.min.js
3849 ms
scripts.js
2453 ms
location-front.min.js
2394 ms
jquery.lightbox-0.5.min.js
3300 ms
core.min.js
3301 ms
widget.min.js
3285 ms
position.min.js
3285 ms
menu.min.js
3649 ms
wp-a11y.min.js
3775 ms
autocomplete.min.js
3647 ms
goMap.min.js
3774 ms
datepicker.min.js
3669 ms
mouse.min.js
3669 ms
slider.min.js
3737 ms
effect.min.js
3617 ms
effect-slide.min.js
3616 ms
jquery.ui.timepicker.min.js
3651 ms
jRating.jquery.min.js
3449 ms
on_document_load.js
2798 ms
geometa.min.js
2720 ms
comment-reply.min.js
2693 ms
main.min.js
2804 ms
cluster_script.js
2665 ms
wp-embed.min.js
2504 ms
ga.js
841 ms
header2x.jpg
886 ms
toolbar_find.png
885 ms
imageCache.php
1091 ms
6b014e2cb4b1dd9116b42af97295174b.jpg
1090 ms
b06507cf4b540e7df32f99ae40e82bf9.jpg
1090 ms
imageCache.php
5369 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
569 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
233 ms
__utm.gif
68 ms
common.js
171 ms
util.js
148 ms
geocoder.js
148 ms
2handbags.com SEO score
N/A
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise 2handbags.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that 2handbags.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
2handbags.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of 2 Handbags. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: