Tools & Wizards About Us
4wallsinbaltimore.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 16

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    30% of other websites

  • 77

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 45% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    81% of websites

  • 97

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    91% of websites

4wallsinbaltimore.com

欧美日韩亚洲另类专区_亚洲天堂在线视频_免费AV在线播放_欧美亚洲中文字幕_亚洲精品东京热1区2区,人妻社长中文字幕,在线日本∨a精品视频,日韩国产精品天天更新,国产3p露脸福利在线视频,日本高清中文字幕阿v免费_精品久久久久中文字,av免费福利网址网站,亚洲精品无码白丝喷白浆,亚欧人成欧美中文字幕...

Page Load Speed

1.8 sec in total

First Response

165 ms

Resources Loaded

1.2 sec

Page Rendered

370 ms

4wallsinbaltimore.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to 4wallsinbaltimore.com homepage info - get ready to check 4 Wallsinbaltimore best content right away, or after learning these important things about 4wallsinbaltimore.com

欧美日韩亚洲另类专区_亚洲天堂在线视频_免费AV在线播放_欧美亚洲中文字幕_亚洲精品东京热1区2区,人妻社长中文字幕,在线日本∨a精品视频,日韩国产精品天天更新,国产3p露脸福利在线视频,日本高清中文字幕阿v免费_精品久久久久中文字,av免费福利网址网站,亚洲精品无码白丝喷白浆,亚欧人成欧美中文字幕,国产日韩另类中字,有码中文无码中文_久久亚洲男人第一av网站香蕉,亚洲乱亚洲妇无码,亚洲中文字幕在...

Visit 4wallsinbaltimore.com

Key Findings

We analyzed 4wallsinbaltimore.com page load time and found that the first response time was 165 ms and then it took 1.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

4wallsinbaltimore.com performance score

16

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value7.2 s

1/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value11.9 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.0 s

21/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,080 ms

7/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.149

76/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value22.6 s

1/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

4wallsinbaltimore.com

165 ms

www.4wallsinbaltimore.com

309 ms

style.css

64 ms

font-awesome.min.css

110 ms

owl.carousel.css

98 ms

Our browser made a total of 36 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 56% of them (20 requests) were addressed to the original 4wallsinbaltimore.com, 11% (4 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com and 11% (4 requests) were made to Tpc.googlesyndication.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (531 ms) belongs to the original domain 4wallsinbaltimore.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 115.8 kB (5%)

Content Size

2.1 MB

After Optimization

2.0 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of 4wallsinbaltimore.com main page is 2.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.9 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 18.3 kB

  • Original 23.2 kB
  • After minification 21.3 kB
  • After compression 4.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 18.3 kB or 79% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 380 B

  • Original 1.9 MB
  • After minification 1.9 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. 4 Wallsinbaltimore images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-32%

Potential reduce by 36.2 kB

  • Original 112.6 kB
  • After minification 112.5 kB
  • After compression 76.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 36.2 kB or 32% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 60.9 kB

  • Original 70.6 kB
  • After minification 62.6 kB
  • After compression 9.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. 4wallsinbaltimore.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 60.9 kB or 86% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 15 (45%)

Requests Now

33

After Optimization

18

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 33 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of 4 Wallsinbaltimore. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 10 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

4wallsinbaltimore.com

4wallsinbaltimore.com

165 ms

www.4wallsinbaltimore.com

www.4wallsinbaltimore.com

309 ms

style.css

style.css

64 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

110 ms

owl.carousel.css

owl.carousel.css

98 ms

slicknav.css

slicknav.css

92 ms

css

css

24 ms

css

css

36 ms

adsbygoogle.js

adsbygoogle.js

13 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

32 ms

responsiveslides.min.js

responsiveslides.min.js

93 ms

owl.carousel.min.js

owl.carousel.min.js

155 ms

jquery.slicknav.min.js

jquery.slicknav.min.js

191 ms

logo.png

logo.png

205 ms

index1.jpg

index1.jpg

445 ms

index2.jpg

index2.jpg

367 ms

index3.jpg

index3.jpg

531 ms

index4.jpg

index4.jpg

401 ms

index5.jpg

index5.jpg

514 ms

roland-ridge.jpg

roland-ridge.jpg

283 ms

929-apartments.jpg

929-apartments.jpg

401 ms

tindeco-wharf.jpg

tindeco-wharf.jpg

466 ms

ca-pub-5076157274409172.js

ca-pub-5076157274409172.js

149 ms

zrt_lookup.html

zrt_lookup.html

143 ms

show_ads_impl.js

show_ads_impl.js

84 ms

equal.png

equal.png

302 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

339 ms

ads

ads

321 ms

osd.js

osd.js

6 ms

css

css

55 ms

m_js_controller.js

m_js_controller.js

29 ms

abg.js

abg.js

31 ms

nessie_icon_thin_arrow_big_white.png

nessie_icon_thin_arrow_big_white.png

29 ms

s

s

13 ms

googlelogo_color_112x36dp.png

googlelogo_color_112x36dp.png

51 ms

x_button_blue2.png

x_button_blue2.png

3 ms

Accessibility Review

4wallsinbaltimore.com accessibility score

77

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

High

ARIA IDs are not unique

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Some elements have a [tabindex] value greater than 0

Best Practices

4wallsinbaltimore.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

4wallsinbaltimore.com SEO score

97

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise 4wallsinbaltimore.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that 4wallsinbaltimore.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

4wallsinbaltimore.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of 4 Wallsinbaltimore. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: