Report Summary

  • 55

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    72% of other websites

  • 40

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 18% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 84

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    53% of websites

56mp.com

临沂物流网 临沂物流 临沂56物流网-物流名片网(56mp.com)

Page Load Speed

9.2 sec in total

First Response

3.1 sec

Resources Loaded

6.1 sec

Page Rendered

0 ms

56mp.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to 56mp.com homepage info - get ready to check 56 Mp best content right away, or after learning these important things about 56mp.com

物流名片网 作为专业的 临沂物流网 主要提供临沂物流专线查询、临沂物流公司查询、临沂物流公司地址、电话查询等服务,临沂56物流网出版发行临沂物流公司查询杂志方便用户发货,我们将做专业的 临沂物流网 为广大批发城商户和临沂物流公司服务!

Visit 56mp.com

Key Findings

We analyzed 56mp.com page load time and found that the first response time was 3.1 sec and then it took 6.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

56mp.com performance score

55

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.8 s

26/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.0 s

13/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value9.9 s

9/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value220 ms

88/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value5.8 s

67/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.56mp.com

3085 ms

reset.css

767 ms

default_blue.css

1983 ms

show.js

530 ms

main.css

1274 ms

Our browser made a total of 5 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to 56mp.com and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.1 sec) belongs to the original domain 56mp.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 41.1 kB (78%)

Content Size

52.4 kB

After Optimization

11.4 kB

In fact, the total size of 56mp.com main page is 52.4 kB. This result falls within a big category (top 100 000) of medium weight web pages. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 49.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-44%

Potential reduce by 1.0 kB

  • Original 2.4 kB
  • After minification 2.4 kB
  • After compression 1.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 1.0 kB or 44% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-48%

Potential reduce by 118 B

  • Original 248 B
  • After minification 199 B
  • After compression 130 B

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 118 B or 48% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 39.9 kB

  • Original 49.8 kB
  • After minification 43.6 kB
  • After compression 9.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. 56mp.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 39.9 kB or 80% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

4

After Optimization

4

The browser has sent 4 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of 56 Mp. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Accessibility Review

56mp.com accessibility score

40

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

56mp.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

56mp.com SEO score

84

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    ZH

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    GBK

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise 56mp.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Chinese is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that 56mp.com main page’s claimed encoding is gbk. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of 56 Mp. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: