Tools & Wizards About Us
6q.io screenshot

Report Summary

  • 17

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    32% of other websites

  • 91

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 77% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    75% of websites

6q.io

6Q Employee Pulse Surveys

Page Load Speed

9.8 sec in total

First Response

500 ms

Resources Loaded

8.9 sec

Page Rendered

484 ms

6q.io screenshot

About Website

Welcome to 6q.io homepage info - get ready to check 6Q best content for India right away, or after learning these important things about 6q.io

Boost your company's culture, improve communication and increase productivity using our online employee feedback and engagement survey app. Sign up today!

Visit 6q.io

Key Findings

We analyzed 6q.io page load time and found that the first response time was 500 ms and then it took 9.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

6q.io performance score

17

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value6.5 s

2/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value7.1 s

5/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value13.9 s

1/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value9,220 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.019

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value22.5 s

1/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

6q.io

500 ms

www.6q.io

502 ms

www.6q.io

1218 ms

jquery-ui.min.css

53 ms

css

60 ms

Our browser made a total of 70 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 44% of them (31 requests) were addressed to the original 6q.io, 9% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 6% (4 requests) were made to Cdnjs.cloudflare.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (5.4 sec) belongs to the original domain 6q.io.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 731.3 kB (41%)

Content Size

1.8 MB

After Optimization

1.1 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of 6q.io main page is 1.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 874.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-72%

Potential reduce by 24.2 kB

  • Original 33.4 kB
  • After minification 30.4 kB
  • After compression 9.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 24.2 kB or 72% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-8%

Potential reduce by 71.0 kB

  • Original 874.8 kB
  • After minification 803.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. 6Q images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-59%

Potential reduce by 247.1 kB

  • Original 418.4 kB
  • After minification 418.4 kB
  • After compression 171.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 247.1 kB or 59% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 389.0 kB

  • Original 461.0 kB
  • After minification 460.4 kB
  • After compression 72.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. 6q.io needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 389.0 kB or 84% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 29 (51%)

Requests Now

57

After Optimization

28

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 57 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of 6Q. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 15 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

6q.io

6q.io

500 ms

www.6q.io

www.6q.io

502 ms

www.6q.io

www.6q.io

1218 ms

jquery-ui.min.css

jquery-ui.min.css

53 ms

css

css

60 ms

layout.min.css

layout.min.css

33 ms

styles.min.css

styles.min.css

60 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

52 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

49 ms

jquery-ui.min.js

jquery-ui.min.js

52 ms

scripts.min.js

scripts.min.js

229 ms

css

css

290 ms

api.js

api.js

228 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

303 ms

176400058

176400058

278 ms

logo.svg

logo.svg

1036 ms

image.php

image.php

2475 ms

graph.svg

graph.svg

1061 ms

image.php

image.php

1749 ms

smile.svg

smile.svg

1184 ms

geometric.gif

geometric.gif

202 ms

image.php

image.php

1259 ms

image.php

image.php

2011 ms

image.php

image.php

2051 ms

image.php

image.php

2160 ms

image.php

image.php

2230 ms

image.php

image.php

2729 ms

image.php

image.php

3701 ms

image.php

image.php

3025 ms

image.php

image.php

3134 ms

image.php

image.php

3225 ms

image.php

image.php

3460 ms

image.php

image.php

3699 ms

image.php

image.php

3999 ms

logo_brw.jpg

logo_brw.jpg

4124 ms

logo_startupdaily.png

logo_startupdaily.png

4216 ms

logo_smart100.jpg

logo_smart100.jpg

4431 ms

logo_australia.jpg

logo_australia.jpg

5402 ms

DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTZS3E-kSBmtLoNJPDtbj2Pk.ttf

DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTZS3E-kSBmtLoNJPDtbj2Pk.ttf

213 ms

k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzJS3E-kSBmtLoNJPDtbj2Pk.ttf

k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzJS3E-kSBmtLoNJPDtbj2Pk.ttf

265 ms

PRmiXeptR36kaC0GEAetxt6Naowg1QhaIq8kLGtQSos.ttf

PRmiXeptR36kaC0GEAetxt6Naowg1QhaIq8kLGtQSos.ttf

359 ms

PRmiXeptR36kaC0GEAetxjdGNerWpg2Hn6A-BxWgZ_I.ttf

PRmiXeptR36kaC0GEAetxjdGNerWpg2Hn6A-BxWgZ_I.ttf

358 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

235 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

217 ms

ajax-loader.gif

ajax-loader.gif

4644 ms

player.js

player.js

182 ms

player.css

player.css

119 ms

ga.js

ga.js

222 ms

vuid.min.js

vuid.min.js

180 ms

conversion_async.js

conversion_async.js

237 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

195 ms

fbevents.js

fbevents.js

258 ms

fallback

fallback

92 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

37 ms

collect

collect

9 ms

collect

collect

85 ms

63 ms

fallback__ltr.css

fallback__ltr.css

18 ms

css

css

44 ms

592671230940346

592671230940346

51 ms

583857168.jpg

583857168.jpg

67 ms

17 ms

logo_48.png

logo_48.png

2 ms

QHD8zigcbDB8aPfIoaupKOvvDin1pK8aKteLpeZ5c0A.ttf

QHD8zigcbDB8aPfIoaupKOvvDin1pK8aKteLpeZ5c0A.ttf

9 ms

RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUSZ2oysoEQEeKwjgmXLRnTc.ttf

RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUSZ2oysoEQEeKwjgmXLRnTc.ttf

9 ms

ga-audiences

ga-audiences

15 ms

15 ms

4 ms

print.css

print.css

979 ms

nr-1044.min.js

nr-1044.min.js

12 ms

Accessibility Review

6q.io accessibility score

91

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

ARIA input fields do not have accessible names

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

6q.io best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

6q.io SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise 6q.io can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that 6q.io main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

6q.io

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of 6Q. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: