6.8 sec in total
1.6 sec
4.7 sec
586 ms
Click here to check amazing Abinesh content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about abinesh.com
the way I see it
Visit abinesh.comWe analyzed Abinesh.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.6 sec and then it took 5.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.
abinesh.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.9 s
54/100
10%
Value6.0 s
14/100
25%
Value5.2 s
61/100
10%
Value1,090 ms
24/100
30%
Value0.005
100/100
15%
Value12.0 s
17/100
10%
1585 ms
331 ms
135 ms
200 ms
6 ms
Our browser made a total of 103 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 69% of them (71 requests) were addressed to the original Abinesh.com, 7% (7 requests) were made to S0.wp.com and 3% (3 requests) were made to S.gravatar.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2 sec) relates to the external source I2.wp.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.3 MB (61%)
2.2 MB
869.2 kB
In fact, the total size of Abinesh.com main page is 2.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 1.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 45.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 45.3 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 880 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Abinesh images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 830.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 830.0 kB or 72% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 472.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Abinesh.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 472.3 kB or 83% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 80 (83%)
96
16
The browser has sent 96 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Abinesh. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 56 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 26 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
abinesh.com
1585 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
331 ms
styles.css
135 ms
sb-instagram.css
200 ms
font-awesome.min.css
6 ms
swipebox.min.css
137 ms
checkbox.min.css
138 ms
bootstrap.css
595 ms
css
25 ms
owl.carousel.css
227 ms
owl.theme.css
225 ms
style.css
617 ms
responsive.css
487 ms
animations.css
364 ms
font-awesome.css
563 ms
select2.css
626 ms
offcanvasmenu.css
539 ms
nanoscroller.css
625 ms
idangerous.swiper.css
670 ms
dashicons.min.css
891 ms
thickbox.css
694 ms
form.min.css
751 ms
cache.skin.css
823 ms
jetpack.css
1019 ms
jquery.js
1149 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
891 ms
jquery.swipebox.min.js
955 ms
front.js
1028 ms
cache.skin.js
1027 ms
jquery-ui.custom.css
966 ms
wpdk.css
1080 ms
jquery.cycle.js
1123 ms
slideshow-shortcode.js
963 ms
photon.js
962 ms
jquery.form.min.js
1125 ms
scripts.js
1073 ms
sb-instagram.js
1192 ms
devicepx-jetpack.js
5 ms
gprofiles.js
57 ms
wpgroho.js
1069 ms
thickbox.js
1257 ms
bootstrap.min.js
1334 ms
easing.js
1282 ms
select2.min.js
1513 ms
owl.carousel.min.js
1393 ms
jquery.nanoscroller.min.js
1395 ms
template.js
1453 ms
e-201611.js
3 ms
wp-embed.min.js
1354 ms
core.min.js
1369 ms
widget.min.js
1401 ms
tabs.min.js
1351 ms
mouse.min.js
1293 ms
resizable.min.js
1462 ms
draggable.min.js
1421 ms
button.min.js
1385 ms
position.min.js
1432 ms
dialog.min.js
1420 ms
datepicker.min.js
1540 ms
menu.min.js
1465 ms
autocomplete.min.js
1398 ms
slider.min.js
1358 ms
sortable.min.js
1429 ms
droppable.min.js
1326 ms
jquery.timepicker.js
1600 ms
jquery.validate.js
1525 ms
wpdk.js
1616 ms
distracted-parents_wide-5694743d781df652a2c5811e7c46e94211e0ab5f.jpg
1996 ms
PC-sleep-mode.jpg
799 ms
Capture.png
1717 ms
hornpleaseRedFort.jpg
713 ms
2800H-RWHsm.jpg
694 ms
postmessage.js
1273 ms
jquery.jetpack-resize.js
1230 ms
jquery.inview.js
1264 ms
vWaBJIbaQuBNz02ALIKJ3A.ttf
8 ms
h0STFiiHJJuefGZJAxrSiA.ttf
17 ms
queuehandler.js
1426 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
7 ms
widgets.js
83 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
1598 ms
slider-loading.gif
1539 ms
loader.png
1503 ms
master.html
220 ms
abinesh
273 ms
recent
432 ms
hovercard.css
107 ms
services.css
112 ms
timeline.d11f7a3b3287fb94220e8ee6d03cc772.js
208 ms
loadingAnimation.gif
313 ms
select2.png
196 ms
g.gif
65 ms
jquery.js
60 ms
postmessage.js
3 ms
jed.js
10 ms
underscore.min.js
8 ms
syndication
183 ms
536519413034283008
332 ms
jquery.wpcom-proxy-request.js
3 ms
52 ms
likes-rest.js
11 ms
54 ms
batch
71 ms
abinesh.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
abinesh.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools
abinesh.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
N/A
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Abinesh.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Abinesh.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
abinesh.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Abinesh. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: