Tools & Wizards About Us
acoel.org screenshot

Report Summary

  • 7

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    22% of other websites

  • 75

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 42% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    81% of websites

  • 84

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    53% of websites

acoel.org

Homepage - ACOEL

Page Load Speed

7.3 sec in total

First Response

982 ms

Resources Loaded

1.6 sec

Page Rendered

4.7 sec

acoel.org screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing ACOEL content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about acoel.org

American College of Environmental Lawyers Blog

Visit acoel.org

Key Findings

We analyzed Acoel.org page load time and found that the first response time was 982 ms and then it took 6.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster. This domain responded with an error, which can significantly jeopardize Acoel.org rating and web reputation

Performance Metrics

acoel.org performance score

7

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.1 s

21/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value22.1 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value9.4 s

12/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,650 ms

11/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value1.159

1/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value21.9 s

1/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

acoel.org

982 ms

js.axd

442 ms

js.axd

192 ms

js.axd

268 ms

js.axd

239 ms

Our browser made a total of 46 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 91% of them (42 requests) were addressed to the original Acoel.org, 4% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Ajax.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (982 ms) belongs to the original domain Acoel.org.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 294.8 kB (44%)

Content Size

671.9 kB

After Optimization

377.1 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Acoel.org main page is 671.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 294.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-74%

Potential reduce by 156.8 kB

  • Original 212.6 kB
  • After minification 197.6 kB
  • After compression 55.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 156.8 kB or 74% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-8%

Potential reduce by 22.9 kB

  • Original 294.9 kB
  • After minification 272.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. ACOEL images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-67%

Potential reduce by 87.0 kB

  • Original 130.4 kB
  • After minification 94.6 kB
  • After compression 43.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 87.0 kB or 67% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 28.1 kB

  • Original 34.0 kB
  • After minification 24.8 kB
  • After compression 5.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Acoel.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 28.1 kB or 83% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 28 (65%)

Requests Now

43

After Optimization

15

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 43 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of ACOEL. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 20 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

acoel.org

acoel.org

982 ms

js.axd

js.axd

442 ms

js.axd

js.axd

192 ms

js.axd

js.axd

268 ms

js.axd

js.axd

239 ms

js.axd

js.axd

273 ms

css.axd

css.axd

271 ms

functions.js

functions.js

318 ms

css.axd

css.axd

347 ms

styles-site.css

styles-site.css

366 ms

dropdown.css

dropdown.css

389 ms

default.css

default.css

418 ms

shCore.css

shCore.css

434 ms

shThemeDefault.css

shThemeDefault.css

489 ms

shCore.js

shCore.js

490 ms

shBrushCSharp.js

shBrushCSharp.js

528 ms

shBrushCss.js

shBrushCss.js

529 ms

shBrushJScript.js

shBrushJScript.js

530 ms

shBrushPlain.js

shBrushPlain.js

538 ms

shBrushSql.js

shBrushSql.js

565 ms

shBrushVb.js

shBrushVb.js

616 ms

shBrushXml.js

shBrushXml.js

628 ms

WebResource.axd

WebResource.axd

602 ms

WebResource.axd

WebResource.axd

616 ms

default.css

default.css

650 ms

nivo-slider.css

nivo-slider.css

664 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

6 ms

jquery.nivo.slider.js

jquery.nivo.slider.js

740 ms

lexisBadge.jpeg

lexisBadge.jpeg

514 ms

muskogee.jpg

muskogee.jpg

84 ms

image.axd

image.axd

513 ms

image.axd

image.axd

395 ms

ga.js

ga.js

35 ms

image.axd

image.axd

549 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

12 ms

rssButton.png

rssButton.png

317 ms

js.axd

js.axd

273 ms

res.axd

res.axd

274 ms

contentbg.png

contentbg.png

221 ms

logo.jpg

logo.jpg

454 ms

rightborder.png

rightborder.png

281 ms

download.png

download.png

137 ms

bg_blockquote.png

bg_blockquote.png

138 ms

Menubutton.png

Menubutton.png

130 ms

footerbg.png

footerbg.png

111 ms

css.axd

css.axd

79 ms

Accessibility Review

acoel.org accessibility score

75

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

High

ARIA input fields do not have accessible names

High

Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

acoel.org best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

acoel.org SEO score

84

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Acoel.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Acoel.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

acoel.org

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of ACOEL. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: