Tools & Wizards About Us
admissiontrack.in screenshot

Report Summary

  • 58

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    74% of other websites

  • 78

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 46% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 91

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    71% of websites

admissiontrack.in

Online Admission System | E-Admission for Educational Institutions

Page Load Speed

4.1 sec in total

First Response

491 ms

Resources Loaded

3.5 sec

Page Rendered

64 ms

admissiontrack.in screenshot

About Website

Visit admissiontrack.in now to see the best up-to-date Admission Track content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about admissiontrack.in

The system as the name clarifies is developed Colleges and Universities to help automate the admission procedure. The system is an internet based application which can be accessed from anytime anywher...

Visit admissiontrack.in

Key Findings

We analyzed Admissiontrack.in page load time and found that the first response time was 491 ms and then it took 3.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

admissiontrack.in performance score

58

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.4 s

16/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.2 s

24/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.1 s

31/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value230 ms

87/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value6.4 s

60/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

admissiontrack.in

491 ms

admissiontrack.in

981 ms

SecureLogin.aspx

250 ms

css

55 ms

font-awesome.min.css

42 ms

Our browser made a total of 21 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 43% of them (9 requests) were addressed to the original Admissiontrack.in, 19% (4 requests) were made to Ajax.aspnetcdn.com and 19% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Admissiontrack.in.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 32.7 kB (30%)

Content Size

107.5 kB

After Optimization

74.8 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Admissiontrack.in main page is 107.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 56.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-66%

Potential reduce by 9.3 kB

  • Original 14.1 kB
  • After minification 13.0 kB
  • After compression 4.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 9.3 kB or 66% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-31%

Potential reduce by 11.4 kB

  • Original 37.1 kB
  • After minification 25.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Admission Track needs image optimization as it can save up to 11.4 kB or 31% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-21%

Potential reduce by 12.0 kB

  • Original 56.3 kB
  • After minification 56.3 kB
  • After compression 44.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 12.0 kB or 21% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 8 (62%)

Requests Now

13

After Optimization

5

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 13 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Admission Track. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

admissiontrack.in

admissiontrack.in

491 ms

admissiontrack.in

admissiontrack.in

981 ms

SecureLogin.aspx

SecureLogin.aspx

250 ms

css

css

55 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

42 ms

simple-line-icons.min.css

simple-line-icons.min.css

49 ms

loginlegacyStyles

loginlegacyStyles

729 ms

jqueryScript

jqueryScript

974 ms

WebForms.js

WebForms.js

37 ms

WebUIValidation.js

WebUIValidation.js

35 ms

MicrosoftAjax.js

MicrosoftAjax.js

36 ms

MicrosoftAjaxWebForms.js

MicrosoftAjaxWebForms.js

35 ms

loginlegacyScript

loginlegacyScript

1489 ms

df282483-55b0-40c7-b2aa-8d3465032bab.png

df282483-55b0-40c7-b2aa-8d3465032bab.png

254 ms

CaptchaImage.axd

CaptchaImage.axd

287 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0C4n.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0C4n.ttf

23 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0C4n.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0C4n.ttf

27 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1y4n.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1y4n.ttf

33 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1y4n.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1y4n.ttf

36 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

11 ms

sprite.png

sprite.png

250 ms

Accessibility Review

admissiontrack.in accessibility score

78

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

admissiontrack.in best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

admissiontrack.in SEO score

91

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Admissiontrack.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Admissiontrack.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

admissiontrack.in

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Admission Track. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: