4.2 sec in total
291 ms
3.3 sec
536 ms
Click here to check amazing Affiz content for Morocco. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about affiz.com
Mediation Platform for mobile and desktop websites. Increase your revenue and save your time. Our solutions: rewarded videos, preroll, interstitial and display banners.
Visit affiz.comWe analyzed Affiz.com page load time and found that the first response time was 291 ms and then it took 3.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
affiz.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.8 s
5/100
10%
Value12.1 s
0/100
25%
Value12.0 s
4/100
10%
Value330 ms
75/100
30%
Value0.025
100/100
15%
Value16.6 s
5/100
10%
291 ms
1100 ms
37 ms
99 ms
191 ms
Our browser made a total of 90 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 92% of them (83 requests) were addressed to the original Affiz.com, 2% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Ajax.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Affiz.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.3 MB (48%)
2.7 MB
1.4 MB
In fact, the total size of Affiz.com main page is 2.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 36.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 36.4 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 25.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Affiz images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 692.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 692.5 kB or 70% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 545.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Affiz.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 545.8 kB or 86% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 64 (74%)
87
23
The browser has sent 87 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Affiz. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 49 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 17 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
affiz.com
291 ms
www.affiz.com
1100 ms
ga.js
37 ms
cache.skin.css
99 ms
styles.css
191 ms
jquery-ui.min.css
35 ms
jquery-ui-timepicker-addon.min.css
191 ms
settings.css
196 ms
font-awesome.min.css
191 ms
jkreativ-icon.min.css
195 ms
style.css
200 ms
plugin.css
283 ms
main.css
393 ms
boxed.css
290 ms
transparent.css
295 ms
jmegamenu.css
291 ms
mediaelementplayer.min.css
300 ms
responsive.css
377 ms
css
71 ms
js_composer.css
382 ms
jquery.js
488 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
470 ms
jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js
567 ms
jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js
586 ms
menu_functions.js
473 ms
jquery.form.min.js
476 ms
scripts.js
562 ms
core.min.js
604 ms
datepicker.min.js
605 ms
jquery.ui.datepicker-fr.min.js
51 ms
jquery-ui-timepicker-addon.min.js
607 ms
jquery-ui-timepicker-fr.js
656 ms
widget.min.js
657 ms
mouse.min.js
660 ms
slider.min.js
663 ms
button.min.js
665 ms
jquery-ui-sliderAccess.js
678 ms
retina.min.js
749 ms
jquery.jcommon.js
751 ms
main.js
755 ms
__utm.gif
16 ms
mediaelement-and-player.min.js
762 ms
essencialplugin.js
588 ms
smoothscroll.js
600 ms
jquery.jpageload.js
664 ms
nprogress.js
661 ms
comment-reply.min.js
664 ms
jquery.sharrre.min.js
677 ms
fotorama.js
600 ms
bootstrap.js
657 ms
klass.min.js
661 ms
code.photoswipe.jquery-3.0.5.1.min.js
663 ms
jquery.jresponsive360.js
666 ms
jquery.jnormalblog.js
587 ms
jquery.jtooltip.js
602 ms
jquery.slitslider.js
663 ms
infobubble.js
658 ms
owl.carousel.min.js
638 ms
waypoints.js
586 ms
jquery.isotope.min.js
582 ms
jquery.jnpslider.js
599 ms
jquery.magnific-popup.min.js
636 ms
jquery.typer.js
575 ms
odometer.min.js
560 ms
jquery.tubular.1.0.js
540 ms
jquery.jlanding.js
543 ms
js_composer_front.js
566 ms
affiz-logo-mini.png
617 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
760 ms
bg-slideshow.jpg
998 ms
imac-iphone6-slideshow-game3.png
1043 ms
desktop1-e1426176385779.png
586 ms
web-mobile-e1426176112661.png
601 ms
facebook-e1426176106234.png
642 ms
android-e1426176088193.png
585 ms
rewarded-video-icon.png
802 ms
Preload-video-interstitiels-mobile-icon.png
748 ms
Banni%C3%A8res-display-sites-web-desktop-mobilE-icon.png
667 ms
bg-publishers.jpg
922 ms
client-pretty-simple.png
681 ms
client-adictiz.png
757 ms
client-iscool.png
771 ms
client-ooblada.png
793 ms
client-jeuxjeuxjeux.png
833 ms
bg-testimonial.jpg
926 ms
affiz-logo-retina.png
806 ms
bg-chiffres.jpg
1001 ms
iframe_api
105 ms
ajax-loader.gif
549 ms
www-widgetapi.js
22 ms
affiz.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Form elements do not have associated labels
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
affiz.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
affiz.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
FR
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Affiz.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed French language. Our system also found out that Affiz.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
affiz.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Affiz. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: