Report Summary

  • 42

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    61% of other websites

  • 98

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 94% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    95% of websites

afm.nl

Voor de Sector

Page Load Speed

4.6 sec in total

First Response

423 ms

Resources Loaded

3.6 sec

Page Rendered

550 ms

afm.nl screenshot

About Website

Welcome to afm.nl homepage info - get ready to check Afm best content for Netherlands right away, or after learning these important things about afm.nl

Voor de Sector

Visit afm.nl

Key Findings

We analyzed Afm.nl page load time and found that the first response time was 423 ms and then it took 4.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

afm.nl performance score

42

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.8 s

28/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value8.0 s

3/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.4 s

28/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value460 ms

62/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.002

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value11.0 s

21/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

afm.nl

423 ms

afm.nl

772 ms

afm

568 ms

modernizr

450 ms

jquery.min.js

95 ms

Our browser made a total of 28 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 68% of them (19 requests) were addressed to the original Afm.nl, 7% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 4% (1 request) were made to Ajax.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (772 ms) belongs to the original domain Afm.nl.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 25.8 kB (10%)

Content Size

246.2 kB

After Optimization

220.3 kB

In fact, the total size of Afm.nl main page is 246.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 179.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-71%

Potential reduce by 11.9 kB

  • Original 16.8 kB
  • After minification 14.1 kB
  • After compression 4.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 2.7 kB, which is 16% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 11.9 kB or 71% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 6.1 kB

  • Original 179.6 kB
  • After minification 173.5 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Afm images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-16%

Potential reduce by 7.8 kB

  • Original 49.7 kB
  • After minification 47.4 kB
  • After compression 41.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 7.8 kB or 16% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 11 (55%)

Requests Now

20

After Optimization

9

The browser has sent 20 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Afm. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

afm.nl accessibility score

98

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

afm.nl best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

afm.nl SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    NL

  • Language Claimed

    NL

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Afm.nl can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Dutch is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Afm.nl main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Afm. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: