2.8 sec in total
397 ms
2.2 sec
208 ms
Click here to check amazing AFT content for Russia. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about aft.ru
Агентство Aft Digital специализируется на разработке стратегии и продвижении бизнеса клиента в интернете.
Visit aft.ruWe analyzed Aft.ru page load time and found that the first response time was 397 ms and then it took 2.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.
aft.ru performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value6.0 s
4/100
10%
Value12.3 s
0/100
25%
Value12.7 s
3/100
10%
Value1,410 ms
15/100
30%
Value0.041
99/100
15%
Value13.3 s
11/100
10%
397 ms
422 ms
191 ms
185 ms
285 ms
Our browser made a total of 75 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 56% of them (42 requests) were addressed to the original Aft.ru, 15% (11 requests) were made to Vk.com and 11% (8 requests) were made to Apis.google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (655 ms) relates to the external source Static.xx.fbcdn.net.
Page size can be reduced by 431.6 kB (61%)
706.5 kB
274.9 kB
In fact, the total size of Aft.ru main page is 706.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 439.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 24.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 24.7 kB or 73% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 16.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, AFT needs image optimization as it can save up to 16.5 kB or 11% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 317.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 317.5 kB or 72% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 72.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Aft.ru needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 72.9 kB or 81% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 26 (37%)
71
45
The browser has sent 71 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of AFT. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 23 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
aft.ru
397 ms
www.aft.ru
422 ms
style.css
191 ms
my.css
185 ms
jquery-1.4.2.min.js
285 ms
script.js
188 ms
jquery.fancybox-1.3.1.pack.js
194 ms
jquery.validate.js
274 ms
openapi.js
369 ms
openapi.js
373 ms
widgets.js
17 ms
plusone.js
54 ms
print.css
100 ms
ga.js
29 ms
logo.png
137 ms
border2.gif
136 ms
send-button.png
138 ms
gold_ya_direct.png
135 ms
gold_sm.gif
136 ms
comp_kp.gif
138 ms
c-1c.png
218 ms
partner-logo1.png
212 ms
partner-logo2.png
212 ms
partner-logo3.png
211 ms
partner-logo4.png
229 ms
icon-tt.gif
229 ms
icon-print.png
298 ms
block-ltc.gif
281 ms
block-rtc.gif
284 ms
border.gif
282 ms
icon-blog-footnote.gif
283 ms
aside-block-footnote.gif
283 ms
block-lbc.gif
367 ms
block-rbc.gif
368 ms
__utm.gif
26 ms
wait.gif
342 ms
upload.gif
147 ms
search-bg.png
305 ms
search-button-bg.gif
317 ms
widget_like.php
264 ms
watch.js
40 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
37 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_1
59 ms
fastbutton
104 ms
OurWork.html
277 ms
button.71000885400e222c3c0eec823f8f93f0.js
82 ms
like.php
157 ms
postmessageRelay
96 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
30 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_1
29 ms
grlryt2bdKIyfMSOhzd1eA.woff
81 ms
tweet_button.fd774b599f565016d763dd860cb31c79.en.html
33 ms
1077434459-postmessagerelay.js
33 ms
rpc:shindig_random.js
48 ms
Sh_BYjerrZ8.js
586 ms
LVx-xkvaJ0b.png
655 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
4 ms
loader_nav19239_3.js
128 ms
lite.css
132 ms
lite.js
506 ms
lang3_0.js
249 ms
widgets.css
254 ms
xdm.js
253 ms
al_like.js
251 ms
jot
100 ms
edcom.jpg
103 ms
logo_lgmaster-v2.jpg
201 ms
lg_logo.jpg
102 ms
hino-icon-aft1.jpg
102 ms
lenovoprofi-logo.jpg
200 ms
maccofe.png
196 ms
rtkomm_logo.png
196 ms
wcg.jpg
196 ms
vebcapital-logo.jpg
378 ms
like_widget.png
135 ms
aft.ru accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
aft.ru best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
aft.ru SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
RU
RU
WINDOWS-1251
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Aft.ru can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Russian is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Aft.ru main page’s claimed encoding is windows-1251. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.
aft.ru
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of AFT. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: