Tools & Wizards About Us
airfax.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 90

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    91% of other websites

  • 61

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 27% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    75% of websites

airfax.com

IFExpress: Your Inflight Entertainment & Connectivity Portal

Page Load Speed

2.3 sec in total

First Response

46 ms

Resources Loaded

2 sec

Page Rendered

198 ms

airfax.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to airfax.com homepage info - get ready to check Airfax best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about airfax.com

IFExpress publishes news and information related to inflight entertainment, connectivity, airlines and airframe manufacturers

Visit airfax.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Airfax.com page load time and found that the first response time was 46 ms and then it took 2.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

airfax.com performance score

90

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.3 s

74/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.8 s

83/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.4 s

74/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value40 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value2.6 s

98/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

airfax.com

46 ms

1004 ms

style.css

64 ms

output.css

20 ms

jquery.qtip.min.css

46 ms

Our browser made a total of 50 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 82% of them (41 requests) were addressed to the original Airfax.com, 4% (2 requests) were made to S7.addthis.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Stats.wordpress.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1 sec) belongs to the original domain Airfax.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 522.5 kB (45%)

Content Size

1.2 MB

After Optimization

638.2 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Airfax.com main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 628.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-70%

Potential reduce by 52.7 kB

  • Original 74.9 kB
  • After minification 71.4 kB
  • After compression 22.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 52.7 kB or 70% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 23.7 kB

  • Original 411.9 kB
  • After minification 388.2 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Airfax images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-65%

Potential reduce by 407.7 kB

  • Original 628.1 kB
  • After minification 624.4 kB
  • After compression 220.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 407.7 kB or 65% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 38.4 kB

  • Original 45.8 kB
  • After minification 33.2 kB
  • After compression 7.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Airfax.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 38.4 kB or 84% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 25 (53%)

Requests Now

47

After Optimization

22

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 47 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Airfax. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 15 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

airfax.com

airfax.com

46 ms

1004 ms

style.css

style.css

64 ms

output.css

output.css

20 ms

jquery.qtip.min.css

jquery.qtip.min.css

46 ms

gce-style.css

gce-style.css

45 ms

cat-posts.css

cat-posts.css

31 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

183 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

57 ms

stray_ajax.js

stray_ajax.js

58 ms

jd.gallery.css.php

jd.gallery.css.php

717 ms

jd.gallery.css

jd.gallery.css

80 ms

mootools.v1.11.js

mootools.v1.11.js

101 ms

jd.gallery.js.php

jd.gallery.js.php

747 ms

jd.gallery.transitions.js

jd.gallery.transitions.js

87 ms

date.js

date.js

87 ms

badge_code_v2.gne

badge_code_v2.gne

102 ms

addthis_widget.js

addthis_widget.js

10 ms

imagesloaded.pkg.min.js

imagesloaded.pkg.min.js

83 ms

jquery.qtip.min.js

jquery.qtip.min.js

126 ms

gce-script.js

gce-script.js

111 ms

wp-embed.min.js

wp-embed.min.js

110 ms

e-201611.js

e-201611.js

8 ms

e-201611.js

e-201611.js

18 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

123 ms

quote.png

quote.png

204 ms

bg.png

bg.png

205 ms

rss.gif

rss.gif

59 ms

logo.png

logo.png

59 ms

Zii_3Q2015.gif

Zii_3Q2015.gif

205 ms

IFPL_Company_rectangle.jpg

IFPL_Company_rectangle.jpg

207 ms

EX4_Thales.jpg

EX4_Thales.jpg

205 ms

waterfrontseat_3-1.jpg

waterfrontseat_3-1.jpg

207 ms

ReversibleUSB_thumb.jpg

ReversibleUSB_thumb.jpg

204 ms

Tradeshow_thumb.jpg

Tradeshow_thumb.jpg

205 ms

waterfrontseat_thumb.jpg

waterfrontseat_thumb.jpg

205 ms

Thales_AVI3_thumb.jpg

Thales_AVI3_thumb.jpg

205 ms

IrisScan_Thumb.jpg

IrisScan_Thumb.jpg

205 ms

MROME_thumb.jpg

MROME_thumb.jpg

212 ms

potpourri3.jpg

potpourri3.jpg

213 ms

JetWave_GA_tailmount_thumb.jpg

JetWave_GA_tailmount_thumb.jpg

212 ms

footer_logo.png

footer_logo.png

213 ms

navbar.png

navbar.png

211 ms

sidebar.png

sidebar.png

202 ms

14269677876_cd3c7e567e_m.jpg

14269677876_cd3c7e567e_m.jpg

186 ms

p

p

184 ms

footer.png

footer.png

212 ms

g.gif

g.gif

139 ms

300lo.json

300lo.json

34 ms

sh.8e5f85691f9aaa082472a194.html

sh.8e5f85691f9aaa082472a194.html

18 ms

Accessibility Review

airfax.com accessibility score

61

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

airfax.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

airfax.com SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Airfax.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Airfax.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

airfax.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Airfax. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: