Tools & Wizards About Us
algonquin.org screenshot

Report Summary

  • 43

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    64% of other websites

  • 85

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 60% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 91

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    71% of websites

algonquin.org

Algonquin, IL / Home

Page Load Speed

2.7 sec in total

First Response

628 ms

Resources Loaded

1.9 sec

Page Rendered

172 ms

algonquin.org screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Algonquin content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about algonquin.org

The official website of Algonquin, IL

Visit algonquin.org

Key Findings

We analyzed Algonquin.org page load time and found that the first response time was 628 ms and then it took 2.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

algonquin.org performance score

43

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.1 s

21/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value8.6 s

1/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.0 s

32/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value200 ms

90/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.242

51/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value9.5 s

30/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

algonquin.org

628 ms

image-crossfade.css

66 ms

mootools-core-1.4.1-full-compat.js

430 ms

mootools-more-1.4.0.1.js

579 ms

image-crossfade.js

119 ms

Our browser made a total of 45 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 80% of them (36 requests) were addressed to the original Algonquin.org, 7% (3 requests) were made to Image.providesupport.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to S7.addthis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (628 ms) belongs to the original domain Algonquin.org.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 806.5 kB (59%)

Content Size

1.4 MB

After Optimization

568.6 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Algonquin.org main page is 1.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 987.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-72%

Potential reduce by 50.8 kB

  • Original 70.6 kB
  • After minification 69.4 kB
  • After compression 19.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 50.8 kB or 72% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 15.5 kB

  • Original 286.7 kB
  • After minification 271.3 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Algonquin images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-73%

Potential reduce by 715.8 kB

  • Original 987.3 kB
  • After minification 835.5 kB
  • After compression 271.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 715.8 kB or 73% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 24.5 kB

  • Original 30.5 kB
  • After minification 21.7 kB
  • After compression 6.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Algonquin.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 24.5 kB or 80% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 20 (47%)

Requests Now

43

After Optimization

23

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 43 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Algonquin. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

algonquin.org

algonquin.org

628 ms

image-crossfade.css

image-crossfade.css

66 ms

mootools-core-1.4.1-full-compat.js

mootools-core-1.4.1-full-compat.js

430 ms

mootools-more-1.4.0.1.js

mootools-more-1.4.0.1.js

579 ms

image-crossfade.js

image-crossfade.js

119 ms

styles.css

styles.css

137 ms

new-dropdown-dyn.css

new-dropdown-dyn.css

69 ms

mediaBoxAdv-Minimal.css

mediaBoxAdv-Minimal.css

102 ms

mediaBoxAdv-Dark.css

mediaBoxAdv-Dark.css

112 ms

top-nav.js

top-nav.js

136 ms

drop-down-menu.js

drop-down-menu.js

145 ms

utilities.js

utilities.js

147 ms

mediaboxAdv.js

mediaboxAdv.js

200 ms

addthis_widget.js

addthis_widget.js

11 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

90 ms

page-bg.jpg

page-bg.jpg

83 ms

shadow.png

shadow.png

83 ms

header-bg.jpg

header-bg.jpg

227 ms

nav-sprites.jpg

nav-sprites.jpg

85 ms

wrapper-bg.png

wrapper-bg.png

80 ms

villagelogo.png

villagelogo.png

162 ms

contact-us.png

contact-us.png

159 ms

search-box.jpg

search-box.jpg

159 ms

search-submit.jpg

search-submit.jpg

160 ms

municipal.jpg

municipal.jpg

161 ms

771320788207720.jpg

771320788207720.jpg

513 ms

feed.png

feed.png

161 ms

x-icon.jpg

x-icon.jpg

162 ms

fb-icon.jpg

fb-icon.jpg

217 ms

twitter-icon.jpg

twitter-icon.jpg

219 ms

email-icon.png

email-icon.png

221 ms

column1-cap.png

column1-cap.png

222 ms

content-end-caps-home.jpg

content-end-caps-home.jpg

275 ms

homepage-sprites.jpg

homepage-sprites.jpg

208 ms

300lo.json

300lo.json

77 ms

771320788207720.jpg

771320788207720.jpg

440 ms

collect

collect

39 ms

safe-standard.js

safe-standard.js

44 ms

sh.8e5f85691f9aaa082472a194.html

sh.8e5f85691f9aaa082472a194.html

32 ms

menu-data.json

menu-data.json

66 ms

collect

collect

78 ms

offline-1277211690.gif

offline-1277211690.gif

54 ms

1v8rh00qwwzrt0immqzno1dcw0

1v8rh00qwwzrt0immqzno1dcw0

55 ms

nav-arrow-off.gif

nav-arrow-off.gif

42 ms

print.css

print.css

32 ms

Accessibility Review

algonquin.org accessibility score

85

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

algonquin.org best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

algonquin.org SEO score

91

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    ISO-8859-1

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Algonquin.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Algonquin.org main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

algonquin.org

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Algonquin. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: