9.4 sec in total
2.8 sec
6.4 sec
212 ms
Visit allmark.in now to see the best up-to-date Allmark content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about allmark.in
Allmark Device Integrations Pvt Ltd is a one-stop source & Supplier of Barcode Printer, Barcode Scanner, POS Terminal, Billing Software Solution in Chennai Madurai Kanchipuram Vellore Trichy Coimbator...
Visit allmark.inWe analyzed Allmark.in page load time and found that the first response time was 2.8 sec and then it took 6.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
allmark.in performance score
2782 ms
596 ms
66 ms
292 ms
535 ms
Our browser made a total of 77 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 81% of them (62 requests) were addressed to the original Allmark.in, 6% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.8 sec) belongs to the original domain Allmark.in.
Page size can be reduced by 969.7 kB (39%)
2.5 MB
1.5 MB
In fact, the total size of Allmark.in main page is 2.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 93.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 51.7 kB, which is 51% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 93.2 kB or 92% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 140.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Allmark images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 419.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 419.7 kB or 68% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 316.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Allmark.in needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 316.1 kB or 87% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 32 (48%)
67
35
The browser has sent 67 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Allmark. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 24 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
allmark.in
2782 ms
www.allmark.in
596 ms
gtm.js
66 ms
bootstrap.min.css
292 ms
main.css
535 ms
green.css
513 ms
owl.carousel.css
506 ms
owl.transitions.css
518 ms
animate.min.css
542 ms
config.css
530 ms
css
21 ms
font-awesome.min.css
760 ms
mbExtruder.css
768 ms
jquery.js
1102 ms
jquery.mb.flipText.js
780 ms
mbExtruder.js
813 ms
AppConfig.js
800 ms
angular.js
1817 ms
jquery-migrate-1.2.1.js
1025 ms
bootstrap.min.js
1039 ms
js
4 ms
gmap3.min.js
1074 ms
bootstrap-hover-dropdown.min.js
1045 ms
owl.carousel.min.js
1270 ms
css_browser_selector.min.js
1282 ms
echo.min.js
1283 ms
jquery.easing-1.3.min.js
1346 ms
bootstrap-slider.min.js
1349 ms
jquery.raty.min.js
1518 ms
jquery.prettyPhoto.min.js
1530 ms
jquery.customSelect.min.js
1521 ms
wow.min.js
1611 ms
scripts.js
1635 ms
allmark.js
1760 ms
conversion_async.js
24 ms
analytics.js
5 ms
collect
7 ms
collect
53 ms
42 ms
36 ms
ga-audiences
29 ms
logo.png
895 ms
XT6715.jpg
668 ms
01-5145.jpg
836 ms
acurel-premium.jpg
838 ms
BP5000.jpg
890 ms
2820.jpg
915 ms
720TVL.jpg
947 ms
2820Plus.jpg
1026 ms
MY001.jpg
1055 ms
FT002.jpg
1129 ms
JS_Prod_3.jpg
1132 ms
AND.png
1154 ms
ptzcamera.jpg
1190 ms
02-T5N.jpg
1292 ms
acurel-classic.jpg
1300 ms
floor-scale.jpg
1368 ms
02-ZT230.jpg
1371 ms
kitchensf4402.jpg
1396 ms
kitchensf4401.jpg
1462 ms
pocket.jpg
1552 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
4 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTYnF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
9 ms
MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSonF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
9 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzInF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
9 ms
EInbV5DfGHOiMmvb1Xr-honF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
9 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
1507 ms
feedback.html
791 ms
quickbooking.html
788 ms
slider01.jpg
809 ms
slider02.jpg
849 ms
slider03.jpg
996 ms
slider04.jpg
986 ms
slider05.jpg
1042 ms
slider06.jpg
1040 ms
extruder_blank.png
1060 ms
lo.gif
310 ms
allmark.in SEO score
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Allmark.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Allmark.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
allmark.in
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Allmark. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: