34.5 sec in total
244 ms
24.5 sec
9.8 sec
Welcome to alphastaff.com homepage info - get ready to check Alpha Staff best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about alphastaff.com
Tailored HR outsourcing solutions - HR, payroll & tax administration, risk & compliance, employee benefits, 401(k) retirement plans, & technology solutions.
Visit alphastaff.comWe analyzed Alphastaff.com page load time and found that the first response time was 244 ms and then it took 34.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only a small number of websites can load faster.
alphastaff.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value6.1 s
3/100
10%
Value11.2 s
0/100
25%
Value7.0 s
32/100
10%
Value360 ms
72/100
30%
Value0.049
99/100
15%
Value10.7 s
22/100
10%
244 ms
33 ms
2921 ms
2347 ms
873 ms
Our browser made a total of 69 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 7% of them (5 requests) were addressed to the original Alphastaff.com, 75% (52 requests) were made to 3jv1ba2woa9k3d5b0wg17bsj-wpengine.netdna-ssl.com and 6% (4 requests) were made to Use.fontawesome.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (7 sec) relates to the external source 3jv1ba2woa9k3d5b0wg17bsj-wpengine.netdna-ssl.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.5 MB (47%)
3.2 MB
1.7 MB
In fact, the total size of Alphastaff.com main page is 3.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 1.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 57.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 57.2 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 29.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Alpha Staff images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 655.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 655.7 kB or 70% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 779.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Alphastaff.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 779.7 kB or 83% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 44 (73%)
60
16
The browser has sent 60 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Alpha Staff. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 20 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 26 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
alphastaff.com
244 ms
www.alphastaff.com
33 ms
www.alphastaff.com
2921 ms
analytics.js
2347 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
873 ms
icons.css
3464 ms
wp_head.css
3430 ms
dwd-maps-extended.css
3429 ms
surbma-divi-gravity-forms.css
3430 ms
style.css
3674 ms
css
4172 ms
css
5526 ms
style.css
4071 ms
themify-icons.css
4008 ms
dflip.css
4053 ms
shortcodes.css
4171 ms
shortcodes_responsive.css
4095 ms
magnific_popup.css
4519 ms
dashicons.min.css
5115 ms
owl.carousel.css
4214 ms
font-awesome.min.css
4215 ms
divi_testimonial_slider_module_v.1.0.css
4405 ms
ts_widget_style.css
4212 ms
archive_testimonial.css
4564 ms
style.css
4513 ms
style.css
4512 ms
style.css
4513 ms
addtoany.min.css
5074 ms
jquery.js
5283 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
5229 ms
addtoany.min.js
4944 ms
795511543c.js
3530 ms
jquery.colorbox-min.js
4999 ms
page.js
3373 ms
et-core-unified-150414858604.min.css
886 ms
frontend-builder-global-functions.js
4933 ms
jquery.mobile.custom.min.js
4988 ms
custom.js
6998 ms
dflip.js
6999 ms
jquery.fitvids.js
6998 ms
waypoints.min.js
6997 ms
jquery.magnific-popup.js
6997 ms
frontend-builder-scripts.js
6972 ms
wp_footer.js
6906 ms
owl.carousel.min.js
6906 ms
b3_equalheight.js
6906 ms
collect
2024 ms
wp-embed.min.js
4265 ms
alphastaff_logo_white_260w.png
486 ms
startup-tech-team.jpg
721 ms
titlebar-bricks.jpg
703 ms
icon_white_human_resources.png
670 ms
icon_white_payroll_and_tax_administration.png
661 ms
icon_white_risk_and_compliance.png
678 ms
icon_white_benefits.png
678 ms
icon_white_benefit_advisory_services.png
678 ms
icon_white_401k_retirement_plan.png
678 ms
icon_white_technology_solutions.png
679 ms
woman-writing-on-notepad.jpg
742 ms
icon_chat.png
743 ms
freshysites_footer_white.png
732 ms
795511543c.css
2615 ms
ySZTeT3IuzJj0GK6uGpbBg.ttf
1931 ms
zXQvrWBJqUooM7Xv98MrQw.ttf
3521 ms
aEdlqgMuYbpe4U3TnqOQMA.ttf
3521 ms
modules.ttf
1274 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
1274 ms
font-awesome-css.min.css
952 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
445 ms
alphastaff.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Links do not have a discernible name
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
alphastaff.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
alphastaff.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Alphastaff.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Alphastaff.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
alphastaff.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Alpha Staff. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: