Report Summary

  • 12

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    25% of other websites

  • 80

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 50% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 99

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

alternativ.no

Alternativ.no – Helse – Inspiration – Livsglede

Page Load Speed

5.7 sec in total

First Response

1.3 sec

Resources Loaded

3.5 sec

Page Rendered

941 ms

alternativ.no screenshot

About Website

Welcome to alternativ.no homepage info - get ready to check Alternativ best content for Norway right away, or after learning these important things about alternativ.no

Norges nettavis og portal for helhetlig helse, innsikt og livsglede. Alt på ett sted. Nyheter, artikler, forskning, skoler, utdanning, og kurs. Trening, kosthold og ernæring. Behandlere og veiledere.

Visit alternativ.no

Key Findings

We analyzed Alternativ.no page load time and found that the first response time was 1.3 sec and then it took 4.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

alternativ.no performance score

12

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.0 s

10/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value15.8 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value11.5 s

5/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value3,230 ms

2/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.184

66/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value19.6 s

2/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

alternativ.no

1297 ms

sub_standard.css

216 ms

nav_horizontal.css

215 ms

nav_vertikal.css

218 ms

forside.css

227 ms

Our browser made a total of 189 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 52% of them (98 requests) were addressed to the original Alternativ.no, 34% (64 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 6% (11 requests) were made to D3dn8ls1xwuebe.cloudfront.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.9 sec) belongs to the original domain Alternativ.no.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 568.5 kB (21%)

Content Size

2.7 MB

After Optimization

2.1 MB

In fact, the total size of Alternativ.no main page is 2.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 85% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 2.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 92.8 kB

  • Original 110.0 kB
  • After minification 87.4 kB
  • After compression 17.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 22.6 kB, which is 21% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 92.8 kB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-9%

Potential reduce by 208.6 kB

  • Original 2.2 MB
  • After minification 2.0 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Alternativ images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-72%

Potential reduce by 176.0 kB

  • Original 244.2 kB
  • After minification 197.9 kB
  • After compression 68.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 176.0 kB or 72% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 91.1 kB

  • Original 110.0 kB
  • After minification 91.2 kB
  • After compression 18.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Alternativ.no needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 91.1 kB or 83% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 47 (39%)

Requests Now

122

After Optimization

75

The browser has sent 122 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Alternativ. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

alternativ.no accessibility score

80

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

alternativ.no best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

alternativ.no SEO score

99

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    NO

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    ISO-8859-1

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Alternativ.no can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Norwegian is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Alternativ.no main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Alternativ. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: