Tools & Wizards About Us
amberoneal.net screenshot

Report Summary

  • 85

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    89% of other websites

  • 86

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 62% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    81% of websites

  • 83

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    46% of websites

amberoneal.net

Page Load Speed

975 ms in total

First Response

170 ms

Resources Loaded

502 ms

Page Rendered

303 ms

amberoneal.net screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Amberoneal content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about amberoneal.net

Visit amberoneal.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Amberoneal.net page load time and found that the first response time was 170 ms and then it took 805 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 15% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

amberoneal.net performance score

85

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.8 s

57/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.2 s

74/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.8 s

96/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value40 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.136

80/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value3.1 s

95/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

amberoneal.net

170 ms

fb5305pink.jpg

98 ms

button_01.jpg

54 ms

button_02.jpg

54 ms

button_03.jpg

54 ms

Our browser made a total of 45 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Amberoneal.net and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (255 ms) belongs to the original domain Amberoneal.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 69.6 kB (12%)

Content Size

565.9 kB

After Optimization

496.3 kB

  • HTML
  • Images

In fact, the total size of Amberoneal.net main page is 565.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 551.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-74%

Potential reduce by 10.8 kB

  • Original 14.6 kB
  • After minification 13.6 kB
  • After compression 3.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 10.8 kB or 74% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-11%

Potential reduce by 58.8 kB

  • Original 551.4 kB
  • After minification 492.5 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Amberoneal needs image optimization as it can save up to 58.8 kB or 11% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

44

After Optimization

44

  • Images

The browser has sent 44 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Amberoneal. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Network Requests Diagram

amberoneal.net

amberoneal.net

170 ms

fb5305pink.jpg

fb5305pink.jpg

98 ms

button_01.jpg

button_01.jpg

54 ms

button_02.jpg

button_02.jpg

54 ms

button_03.jpg

button_03.jpg

54 ms

button_04.jpg

button_04.jpg

56 ms

button_05.jpg

button_05.jpg

54 ms

button_06.jpg

button_06.jpg

77 ms

button_07.jpg

button_07.jpg

79 ms

button_08.jpg

button_08.jpg

79 ms

layout-amber_08.jpg

layout-amber_08.jpg

104 ms

layout-amber_09.jpg

layout-amber_09.jpg

79 ms

layout-amber_10.jpg

layout-amber_10.jpg

102 ms

layout-amber_11.jpg

layout-amber_11.jpg

104 ms

layout-amber_12.jpg

layout-amber_12.jpg

102 ms

layout-amber_13.jpg

layout-amber_13.jpg

104 ms

layout-amber_14.jpg

layout-amber_14.jpg

119 ms

layout-amber_15.jpg

layout-amber_15.jpg

128 ms

layout-amber_16.jpg

layout-amber_16.jpg

128 ms

layout-amber_17.jpg

layout-amber_17.jpg

127 ms

layout-amber_18.jpg

layout-amber_18.jpg

128 ms

layout-amber_19.jpg

layout-amber_19.jpg

177 ms

freetour.jpg

freetour.jpg

169 ms

youtube.jpg

youtube.jpg

255 ms

vocnation.jpg

vocnation.jpg

177 ms

news.jpg

news.jpg

177 ms

dls93.jpg

dls93.jpg

176 ms

dls92.jpg

dls92.jpg

221 ms

dls91.jpg

dls91.jpg

228 ms

overbig_10.jpg

overbig_10.jpg

32 ms

overbig_11.jpg

overbig_11.jpg

27 ms

overbig_12.jpg

overbig_12.jpg

29 ms

overbig_13.jpg

overbig_13.jpg

29 ms

overbig_14.jpg

overbig_14.jpg

30 ms

overbig_15.jpg

overbig_15.jpg

30 ms

overbig_16.jpg

overbig_16.jpg

53 ms

overbig_17.jpg

overbig_17.jpg

55 ms

overbig_18.jpg

overbig_18.jpg

55 ms

over_02.jpg

over_02.jpg

56 ms

over_03.jpg

over_03.jpg

54 ms

over_04.jpg

over_04.jpg

54 ms

over_05.jpg

over_05.jpg

79 ms

over_06.jpg

over_06.jpg

81 ms

over_07.jpg

over_07.jpg

80 ms

over_08.jpg

over_08.jpg

80 ms

Accessibility Review

amberoneal.net accessibility score

86

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

Best Practices

amberoneal.net best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

SEO Factors

amberoneal.net SEO score

83

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    JA

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    ISO-8859-1

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Amberoneal.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Japanese is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Amberoneal.net main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

amberoneal.net

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Amberoneal. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: