Tools & Wizards About Us
analysis-tools.dev screenshot

Report Summary

  • 57

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    75% of other websites

  • 95

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 87% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    57% of websites

  • 90

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    69% of websites

analysis-tools.dev

Compare 598 Static Analysis Tools For All Programming Languages

Page Load Speed

2.9 sec in total

First Response

214 ms

Resources Loaded

2 sec

Page Rendered

713 ms

analysis-tools.dev screenshot

About Website

Welcome to analysis-tools.dev homepage info - get ready to check Analysis Tools best content right away, or after learning these important things about analysis-tools.dev

Overview of the best linters, formatters, quality checkers for JS, Go, Rust, C, Ruby, Python, PHP and more. Compare 598 tools to improve code quality for you and your team in 2021.

Visit analysis-tools.dev

Key Findings

We analyzed Analysis-tools.dev page load time and found that the first response time was 214 ms and then it took 2.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

analysis-tools.dev performance score

57

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.2 s

79/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.6 s

61/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.2 s

99/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,980 ms

8/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value5.6 s

70/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

analysis-tools.dev

214 ms

polyfill-5a481af7aef2be2769c8.js

311 ms

component---src-pages-index-js-93e570019696550a7187.js

66 ms

0c14c075169a9aae7319b9573b5638363cae97f9-ce732319c2f4dd83004f.js

55 ms

1a8d4c661db7c531dea5f4fecbd174f60a9fe761-bd8af0e3ed9da5a96d30.js

84 ms

Our browser made a total of 28 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Analysis-tools.dev and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Analysis-tools.dev.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 55.2 kB (51%)

Content Size

107.8 kB

After Optimization

52.7 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Analysis-tools.dev main page is 107.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 56.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-67%

Potential reduce by 37.9 kB

  • Original 56.7 kB
  • After minification 56.5 kB
  • After compression 18.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 37.9 kB or 67% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-38%

Potential reduce by 17.2 kB

  • Original 44.9 kB
  • After minification 27.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Analysis Tools needs image optimization as it can save up to 17.2 kB or 38% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 110 B

  • Original 6.3 kB
  • After minification 6.3 kB
  • After compression 6.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 8 (30%)

Requests Now

27

After Optimization

19

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript

The browser has sent 27 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Analysis Tools. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 9 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

analysis-tools.dev

analysis-tools.dev

214 ms

polyfill-5a481af7aef2be2769c8.js

polyfill-5a481af7aef2be2769c8.js

311 ms

component---src-pages-index-js-93e570019696550a7187.js

component---src-pages-index-js-93e570019696550a7187.js

66 ms

0c14c075169a9aae7319b9573b5638363cae97f9-ce732319c2f4dd83004f.js

0c14c075169a9aae7319b9573b5638363cae97f9-ce732319c2f4dd83004f.js

55 ms

1a8d4c661db7c531dea5f4fecbd174f60a9fe761-bd8af0e3ed9da5a96d30.js

1a8d4c661db7c531dea5f4fecbd174f60a9fe761-bd8af0e3ed9da5a96d30.js

84 ms

commons-7716534102bc20d58390.js

commons-7716534102bc20d58390.js

82 ms

1bfc9850-bb6e282d5722b3dcc181.js

1bfc9850-bb6e282d5722b3dcc181.js

65 ms

app-792dc4d0e2becb52b2ec.js

app-792dc4d0e2becb52b2ec.js

87 ms

framework-e7a019f02dcae6df5b61.js

framework-e7a019f02dcae6df5b61.js

92 ms

webpack-runtime-e4729a4bcb6bf4bf350d.js

webpack-runtime-e4729a4bcb6bf4bf350d.js

86 ms

logo.svg

logo.svg

95 ms

python.svg

python.svg

214 ms

ruby.svg

ruby.svg

208 ms

php.svg

php.svg

210 ms

c.svg

c.svg

178 ms

javascript.svg

javascript.svg

195 ms

go.svg

go.svg

200 ms

csharp.svg

csharp.svg

1536 ms

java.svg

java.svg

201 ms

hero.svg

hero.svg

220 ms

deepcode.png

deepcode.png

202 ms

codescene.svg

codescene.svg

265 ms

semgrep.svg

semgrep.svg

257 ms

codiga.svg

codiga.svg

261 ms

offensive360.png

offensive360.png

284 ms

github.svg

github.svg

284 ms

app-data.json

app-data.json

66 ms

page-data.json

page-data.json

67 ms

Accessibility Review

analysis-tools.dev accessibility score

95

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best Practices

analysis-tools.dev best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

analysis-tools.dev SEO score

90

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Analysis-tools.dev can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Analysis-tools.dev main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

analysis-tools.dev

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Analysis Tools. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: