Tools & Wizards About Us
analysis-tools.dev screenshot

Report Summary

  • 82

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    87% of other websites

  • 83

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 56% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    81% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    75% of websites

analysis-tools.dev

Analysis Tools and Linters to Improve Code Quality and Avoid Bugs

Page Load Speed

760 ms in total

First Response

87 ms

Resources Loaded

611 ms

Page Rendered

62 ms

analysis-tools.dev screenshot

About Website

Welcome to analysis-tools.dev homepage info - get ready to check Analysis Tools best content right away, or after learning these important things about analysis-tools.dev

Find static code analysis tools and linters for Java, JavaScript, PHP, Python, Ruby, C/C++, C#, Go, Swift, and more. All tools and linters are peer-reviewed by fellow developers to select the best too...

Visit analysis-tools.dev

Key Findings

We analyzed Analysis-tools.dev page load time and found that the first response time was 87 ms and then it took 673 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 10% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

analysis-tools.dev performance score

82

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.5 s

96/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value1.8 s

99/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value1.5 s

100/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value560 ms

52/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.006

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value5.3 s

73/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

analysis-tools.dev

87 ms

d36c2dc21ad1785a.css

37 ms

8f959bd7b34860bb.css

66 ms

b0da674005090f2f.css

68 ms

polyfills-c67a75d1b6f99dc8.js

81 ms

Our browser made a total of 21 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Analysis-tools.dev and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (275 ms) belongs to the original domain Analysis-tools.dev.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 63.1 kB (77%)

Content Size

82.0 kB

After Optimization

19.0 kB

  • HTML
  • Images

In fact, the total size of Analysis-tools.dev main page is 82.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 81.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-77%

Potential reduce by 63.0 kB

  • Original 81.9 kB
  • After minification 81.9 kB
  • After compression 18.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 63.0 kB or 77% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-10%

Potential reduce by 18 B

  • Original 180 B
  • After minification 162 B

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Analysis Tools images are well optimized though.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 11 (65%)

Requests Now

17

After Optimization

6

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 17 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Analysis Tools. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

analysis-tools.dev

analysis-tools.dev

87 ms

d36c2dc21ad1785a.css

d36c2dc21ad1785a.css

37 ms

8f959bd7b34860bb.css

8f959bd7b34860bb.css

66 ms

b0da674005090f2f.css

b0da674005090f2f.css

68 ms

polyfills-c67a75d1b6f99dc8.js

polyfills-c67a75d1b6f99dc8.js

81 ms

webpack-0e3a3ff89caddc61.js

webpack-0e3a3ff89caddc61.js

79 ms

framework-5f4595e5518b5600.js

framework-5f4595e5518b5600.js

103 ms

main-d713beac15da264c.js

main-d713beac15da264c.js

80 ms

_app-0f5d8ce2a4b7f34a.js

_app-0f5d8ce2a4b7f34a.js

144 ms

239-1622571e00d1de51.js

239-1622571e00d1de51.js

151 ms

546-014af821513dcb9f.js

546-014af821513dcb9f.js

151 ms

922-5ec34f5df9c25be5.js

922-5ec34f5df9c25be5.js

164 ms

index-330a902bb4e85346.js

index-330a902bb4e85346.js

163 ms

_buildManifest.js

_buildManifest.js

273 ms

_ssgManifest.js

_ssgManifest.js

275 ms

github-icon.svg

github-icon.svg

200 ms

chevron.png

chevron.png

275 ms

_error-a4ba2246ff8fb532.js

_error-a4ba2246ff8fb532.js

79 ms

Roboto-Bold.ttf

Roboto-Bold.ttf

69 ms

Roboto-Light.ttf

Roboto-Light.ttf

69 ms

Roboto-Regular.ttf

Roboto-Regular.ttf

91 ms

Accessibility Review

analysis-tools.dev accessibility score

83

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best Practices

analysis-tools.dev best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

analysis-tools.dev SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Analysis-tools.dev can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Analysis-tools.dev main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

analysis-tools.dev

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Analysis Tools. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: