Report Summary

  • 38

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    58% of other websites

  • 70

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 36% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    75% of websites

angioclinic.ru

Инновационный сосудистый центр — ИСЦ

Page Load Speed

6.2 sec in total

First Response

1.3 sec

Resources Loaded

4.5 sec

Page Rendered

405 ms

angioclinic.ru screenshot

About Website

Welcome to angioclinic.ru homepage info - get ready to check Angioclinic best content for Russia right away, or after learning these important things about angioclinic.ru

Инновационный сосудистый центр +7 800 222 11 70 —

Visit angioclinic.ru

Key Findings

We analyzed Angioclinic.ru page load time and found that the first response time was 1.3 sec and then it took 4.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

angioclinic.ru performance score

38

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.3 s

40/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.3 s

70/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value12.3 s

3/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,330 ms

5/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.049

99/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value21.6 s

1/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

angioclinic.ru

1312 ms

base.css

905 ms

demo.css

424 ms

jquery-1.7.min.js

1242 ms

jquery.easing.1.3.js

599 ms

Our browser made a total of 38 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 92% of them (35 requests) were addressed to the original Angioclinic.ru, 3% (1 request) were made to Consultsystems.ru and 3% (1 request) were made to Counter.yadro.ru. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Angioclinic.ru.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 159.3 kB (32%)

Content Size

501.9 kB

After Optimization

342.6 kB

In fact, the total size of Angioclinic.ru main page is 501.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 15% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 307.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-75%

Potential reduce by 34.0 kB

  • Original 45.3 kB
  • After minification 44.3 kB
  • After compression 11.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 34.0 kB or 75% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 19.5 kB

  • Original 307.2 kB
  • After minification 287.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Angioclinic images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-69%

Potential reduce by 87.5 kB

  • Original 127.3 kB
  • After minification 115.4 kB
  • After compression 39.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 87.5 kB or 69% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 18.3 kB

  • Original 22.1 kB
  • After minification 17.8 kB
  • After compression 3.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Angioclinic.ru needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 18.3 kB or 83% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 18 (53%)

Requests Now

34

After Optimization

16

The browser has sent 34 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Angioclinic. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 9 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

angioclinic.ru accessibility score

70

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

ARIA input fields do not have accessible names

High

Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

angioclinic.ru best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

angioclinic.ru SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    RU

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    WINDOWS-1251

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Angioclinic.ru can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Russian is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Angioclinic.ru main page’s claimed encoding is windows-1251. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Angioclinic. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: