1 sec in total
42 ms
761 ms
231 ms
Visit annotatorjs.org now to see the best up-to-date Annotator Js content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about annotatorjs.org
Visit annotatorjs.orgWe analyzed Annotatorjs.org page load time and found that the first response time was 42 ms and then it took 992 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.
annotatorjs.org performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value1.3 s
98/100
10%
Value2.1 s
96/100
25%
Value1.3 s
100/100
10%
Value150 ms
94/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value3.3 s
94/100
10%
42 ms
38 ms
37 ms
47 ms
316 ms
Our browser made a total of 26 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 58% of them (15 requests) were addressed to the original Annotatorjs.org, 12% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 8% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (610 ms) relates to the external source Assets.annotateit.org.
Page size can be reduced by 197.7 kB (48%)
415.4 kB
217.6 kB
In fact, the total size of Annotatorjs.org main page is 415.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 140.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 15.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 6.1 kB, which is 31% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 15.1 kB or 77% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 20.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Annotator Js needs image optimization as it can save up to 20.1 kB or 15% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 56.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 56.1 kB or 45% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 106.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Annotatorjs.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 106.4 kB or 76% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 8 (38%)
21
13
The browser has sent 21 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Annotator Js. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 5 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
annotatorjs.org
42 ms
bootstrap.min.css
38 ms
css
37 ms
css
47 ms
annotator.min.css
316 ms
custom.css
34 ms
jquery.min.js
77 ms
annotator-full.min.js
610 ms
main.js
31 ms
jwt.js
40 ms
initAnnotator
166 ms
annotator.png
35 ms
thumb-add.png
35 ms
thumb-viewer.png
49 ms
thumb-bookmarklet.png
43 ms
thumb-editor.png
50 ms
hypothesis.png
55 ms
edX.jpg
51 ms
annotation_studio.jpg
57 ms
peerlibrary.png
60 ms
glyph-logo.png
42 ms
F-uvpIj1hF17IDyvQvI50Q.ttf
7 ms
MViwy4K6e56oHcyeMzjbCQ.ttf
10 ms
BjAYBlHtW3CJxDcjzrnZCJ0EAVxt0G0biEntp43Qt6E.ttf
19 ms
ga.js
8 ms
__utm.gif
12 ms
annotatorjs.org accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Form elements do not have associated labels
annotatorjs.org best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
annotatorjs.org SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Annotatorjs.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Annotatorjs.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
annotatorjs.org
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Annotator Js. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: