12.9 sec in total
3.8 sec
8.7 sec
335 ms
Click here to check amazing Anselmchettiar content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about anselmchettiar.com
Digital Strategist | Marketing Manager | Product Manager
Visit anselmchettiar.comWe analyzed Anselmchettiar.com page load time and found that the first response time was 3.8 sec and then it took 9.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.
anselmchettiar.com performance score
3806 ms
20 ms
323 ms
477 ms
479 ms
Our browser made a total of 82 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 61% of them (50 requests) were addressed to the original Anselmchettiar.com, 4% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (3 requests) were made to Pixel.prfct.co. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.8 sec) belongs to the original domain Anselmchettiar.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.7 MB (76%)
2.3 MB
549.9 kB
In fact, the total size of Anselmchettiar.com main page is 2.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 1.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 64.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 64.6 kB or 75% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 10.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Anselmchettiar needs image optimization as it can save up to 10.1 kB or 11% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 768.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 768.3 kB or 75% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 900.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Anselmchettiar.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 900.9 kB or 83% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 61 (81%)
75
14
The browser has sent 75 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Anselmchettiar. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 31 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 21 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.anselmchettiar.com
3806 ms
analytics.js
20 ms
widget.css
323 ms
validationEngine.jquery.css
477 ms
styles.css
479 ms
tp_twitter_plugin.css
474 ms
settings.css
538 ms
style.css
507 ms
templates.css
594 ms
style.css
737 ms
css
28 ms
css
55 ms
css
48 ms
main.css
1208 ms
font-awesome.min.css
725 ms
custom-225cb93fd1.css
1079 ms
media.css
786 ms
royalslider.css
878 ms
style.css
969 ms
jetpack.css
1072 ms
jquery.js
1058 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
1160 ms
jquery.themepunch.plugins.min.js
1257 ms
jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js
1361 ms
modernizr.js
1319 ms
svg-icons.js
1379 ms
js_composer_front.css
1493 ms
photon.js
1474 ms
jquery.form.min.js
1528 ms
scripts.js
1599 ms
devicepx-jetpack.js
18 ms
gprofiles.js
68 ms
wpgroho.js
1605 ms
jquery.royalslider.min.js
1878 ms
animate-elements.js
1709 ms
plugins.js
2038 ms
desktop-tablet.js
1754 ms
desktop.js
1841 ms
main.js
1918 ms
js_composer_front.js
1971 ms
waypoints.min.js
2061 ms
jquery.cycle.all.min.js
2102 ms
e-201611.js
15 ms
rotating_tweet.js
2144 ms
collect
21 ms
collect
64 ms
jquery.validationEngine.js
1897 ms
jquery.validationEngine-en.js
1777 ms
dt-contact-form.js
1876 ms
skin1.general-boxed-bg-image.jpg
1182 ms
new-blue.jpg
783 ms
a43489e85acf8d5f8de6b0c648b8dc8a_normal.jpeg
90 ms
24c21c5-50x50.jpg
1135 ms
0263e83-50x50.jpg
1149 ms
043ed28-50x50.jpg
1150 ms
reply.png
1168 ms
retweet.png
1188 ms
favorite.png
1172 ms
skin1.stripes-stripe-3-bg-image.jpg
1210 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTYnF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
6 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
13 ms
MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSonF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
12 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
2014 ms
5569629c50baa5b464000069.js
60 ms
widgets.js
24 ms
g.gif
207 ms
hovercard.css
190 ms
services.css
190 ms
button.0308b81ff1714e446f674b5b9793f2cd.js
39 ms
follow_button.b9740740e0bcf9b0657c5b11bd4388da.en.html
18 ms
tagjs
127 ms
jot
101 ms
91 ms
adsct
167 ms
Pug
140 ms
cb
33 ms
sd
23 ms
pixel
18 ms
tap.php
48 ms
cb
6 ms
ncm
11 ms
cb
4 ms
anselmchettiar.com SEO score
N/A
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Anselmchettiar.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Anselmchettiar.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
anselmchettiar.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Anselmchettiar. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: