Report Summary

  • 19

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    36% of other websites

  • 80

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 50% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    81% of websites

  • 91

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    71% of websites

antimicrobialresistancefighters.org

AMR: Combat Antimicrobial Resistance

Page Load Speed

2.4 sec in total

First Response

86 ms

Resources Loaded

2.1 sec

Page Rendered

247 ms

antimicrobialresistancefighters.org screenshot

About Website

Welcome to antimicrobialresistancefighters.org homepage info - get ready to check Antimicrobial Resistance Fighters best content right away, or after learning these important things about antimicrobialresistancefighters.org

Join the Antimicrobial Resistance Fighter Coalition as we unite in our commitment to address the threat and burden of antimicrobial resistance.

Visit antimicrobialresistancefighters.org

Key Findings

We analyzed Antimicrobialresistancefighters.org page load time and found that the first response time was 86 ms and then it took 2.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

antimicrobialresistancefighters.org performance score

19

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.7 s

5/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value19.9 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value16.1 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,770 ms

10/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value21.2 s

1/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

antimicrobialresistancefighters.org

86 ms

antimicrobialresistancefighters.org

313 ms

gtm.js

73 ms

ARFC_Logo.rev-1563049858.svg

42 ms

home_main_banner_a.rev-1560495412.jpg

283 ms

Our browser made a total of 52 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 8% of them (4 requests) were addressed to the original Antimicrobialresistancefighters.org, 73% (38 requests) were made to Arfighters.b-cdn.net and 4% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.7 sec) relates to the external source Arfighters.b-cdn.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 95.7 kB (4%)

Content Size

2.4 MB

After Optimization

2.3 MB

In fact, the total size of Antimicrobialresistancefighters.org main page is 2.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 58.1 kB

  • Original 67.4 kB
  • After minification 43.4 kB
  • After compression 9.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 24.0 kB, which is 36% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 58.1 kB or 86% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 37.5 kB

  • Original 2.3 MB
  • After minification 2.2 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Antimicrobial Resistance Fighters images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 70 B

  • Original 85.1 kB
  • After minification 85.1 kB
  • After compression 85.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 7 (14%)

Requests Now

50

After Optimization

43

The browser has sent 50 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Antimicrobial Resistance Fighters. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 8 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

antimicrobialresistancefighters.org accessibility score

80

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

ARIA IDs are not unique

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

antimicrobialresistancefighters.org best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

antimicrobialresistancefighters.org SEO score

91

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Antimicrobialresistancefighters.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Antimicrobialresistancefighters.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Antimicrobial Resistance Fighters. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: