2.1 sec in total
39 ms
1.8 sec
287 ms
Welcome to appetiteapp.co homepage info - get ready to check Appetiteapp best content right away, or after learning these important things about appetiteapp.co
appetite+ integrates social and personalized elements into app-discovery to provide a meaningful discovery experience.
Visit appetiteapp.coWe analyzed Appetiteapp.co page load time and found that the first response time was 39 ms and then it took 2.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.
appetiteapp.co performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.0 s
23/100
10%
Value4.1 s
46/100
25%
Value5.1 s
61/100
10%
Value130 ms
96/100
30%
Value0.168
70/100
15%
Value4.1 s
86/100
10%
39 ms
312 ms
25 ms
13 ms
332 ms
Our browser made a total of 51 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 80% of them (41 requests) were addressed to the original Appetiteapp.co, 6% (3 requests) were made to S.ytimg.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Youtube.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Appetiteapp.co.
Page size can be reduced by 966.2 kB (69%)
1.4 MB
427.4 kB
In fact, the total size of Appetiteapp.co main page is 1.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 727.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 12.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 12.8 kB or 72% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 4.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Appetiteapp images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 552.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 552.9 kB or 76% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 396.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Appetiteapp.co needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 396.3 kB or 84% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 28 (58%)
48
20
The browser has sent 48 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Appetiteapp. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 20 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
appetiteapp.co
39 ms
www.appetiteapp.co
312 ms
css
25 ms
common-screen
13 ms
font-awesome.css
332 ms
bootstrap.css
669 ms
theme.css
438 ms
theme-elements.css
405 ms
bootstrap-responsive.css
321 ms
theme-responsive.css
333 ms
Site.css
554 ms
modernizr-2.7.1.js
704 ms
jquery-2.0.3.js
1401 ms
jquery.validate.js
599 ms
jquery.easing.js
683 ms
jquery.cookie.js
661 ms
bootstrap.js
965 ms
selectnav.js
766 ms
jquery.flexslider.js
831 ms
jquery.flipshow.js
864 ms
plugins.js
794 ms
theme.js
950 ms
player_api
26 ms
jquery.echoslider.js
823 ms
jail.js
950 ms
view.home.js
947 ms
analytics.js
39 ms
appetite_logo.png
208 ms
gb.png
463 ms
es.png
479 ms
social-sprites.png
284 ms
cover2.jpg
431 ms
logo.png
410 ms
store-en.png
468 ms
divider.png
465 ms
ActivityFeed.png
505 ms
Recognition.png
512 ms
Privacy.png
578 ms
PowerUsers.png
535 ms
Suggestions.png
537 ms
Profile.png
562 ms
comingsoon.png
561 ms
logo_footer.png
603 ms
hNmk02zYFNM
98 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
599 ms
collect
25 ms
www-embed-player-vflfNyN_r.css
28 ms
www-embed-player.js
46 ms
Tqng9ngJVK4Gqvh3e602hP-HqlN49KFEUSDtmrOPmWo.js
33 ms
ad_status.js
38 ms
www-widgetapi.js
7 ms
appetiteapp.co accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
appetiteapp.co best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
appetiteapp.co SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Appetiteapp.co can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Appetiteapp.co main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
appetiteapp.co
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Appetiteapp. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: