Report Summary

  • 47

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    66% of other websites

  • 45

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 19% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 75

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    32% of websites

appliancescompared.net

Steamers Discount | Discount Kegerators | shop Icing & Decorating Spatulas | appliancescompared.net

Page Load Speed

3.3 sec in total

First Response

1 sec

Resources Loaded

1.9 sec

Page Rendered

413 ms

appliancescompared.net screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Appliancescompared content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about appliancescompared.net

Discount for Rice Cookers,Sautã© Pans,Icing & Decorating Spatulas,Steamers,French Bread & Baguette Pans,Kegerators,Bake & Serve Sets,Eufy,| Free Shipping, Save Money Today.

Visit appliancescompared.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Appliancescompared.net page load time and found that the first response time was 1 sec and then it took 2.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

appliancescompared.net performance score

47

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.6 s

33/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.4 s

40/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.4 s

55/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value560 ms

53/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.345

32/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value5.5 s

71/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

appliancescompared.net

1025 ms

jquery-1.9.1.js

16 ms

jquery-ui.js

15 ms

tooltip.js

66 ms

site.js

66 ms

Our browser made a total of 63 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 54% of them (34 requests) were addressed to the original Appliancescompared.net, 30% (19 requests) were made to D3vv6xw699rjh3.cloudfront.net and 3% (2 requests) were made to Code.jquery.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1 sec) belongs to the original domain Appliancescompared.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 311.4 kB (58%)

Content Size

536.2 kB

After Optimization

224.8 kB

In fact, the total size of Appliancescompared.net main page is 536.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 287.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 44.3 kB

  • Original 52.3 kB
  • After minification 47.9 kB
  • After compression 8.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 44.3 kB or 85% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-13%

Potential reduce by 18.1 kB

  • Original 134.6 kB
  • After minification 116.5 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Appliancescompared needs image optimization as it can save up to 18.1 kB or 13% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-69%

Potential reduce by 197.4 kB

  • Original 287.4 kB
  • After minification 249.2 kB
  • After compression 90.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 197.4 kB or 69% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 51.6 kB

  • Original 61.9 kB
  • After minification 56.7 kB
  • After compression 10.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Appliancescompared.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 51.6 kB or 83% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 18 (30%)

Requests Now

61

After Optimization

43

The browser has sent 61 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Appliancescompared. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 15 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

appliancescompared.net accessibility score

45

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

appliancescompared.net best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

appliancescompared.net SEO score

75

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Appliancescompared.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Appliancescompared.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Appliancescompared. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: