5.7 sec in total
552 ms
4.5 sec
611 ms
Click here to check amazing Applicable content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about applicable.com
Applicable Limited · Unified Communications
Visit applicable.comWe analyzed Applicable.com page load time and found that the first response time was 552 ms and then it took 5.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
applicable.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.6 s
31/100
10%
Value5.0 s
27/100
25%
Value5.0 s
63/100
10%
Value190 ms
90/100
30%
Value0.046
99/100
15%
Value5.4 s
71/100
10%
552 ms
924 ms
220 ms
351 ms
762 ms
Our browser made a total of 66 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 53% of them (35 requests) were addressed to the original Applicable.com, 9% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 6% (4 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Applicable.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.2 MB (24%)
4.9 MB
3.7 MB
In fact, the total size of Applicable.com main page is 4.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 4.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 16.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 7.9 kB, which is 40% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 16.1 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 536.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Applicable needs image optimization as it can save up to 536.4 kB or 13% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 264.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 264.9 kB or 63% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 349.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Applicable.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 349.9 kB or 79% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 22 (40%)
55
33
The browser has sent 55 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Applicable. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 17 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
applicable.com
552 ms
modern.css
924 ms
theme-dark.css
220 ms
modern-responsive.css
351 ms
jquery-1.8.2.min.js
762 ms
google-analytics.js
224 ms
jquery.mousewheel.min.js
309 ms
tile-slider.js
483 ms
tile-drag.js
588 ms
jquery.cookie.js
537 ms
jquery.simple-cookie-notice.js
545 ms
jquery.tweet.js
821 ms
css
27 ms
ga.js
99 ms
main_background_1366x768.jpg
313 ms
applicable-logo.png
211 ms
applicable-60px.png
222 ms
world91w.png
210 ms
btvert-150px.png
338 ms
skypeb-white-150px.png
220 ms
DSC_7515_group.jpg
3100 ms
dsc_7338_310x150.jpg
745 ms
dsc_7346_310x150.jpg
639 ms
dsc_7345_310x150.jpg
638 ms
dsc_7344_310x150.jpg
894 ms
dsc_7343_310x150.jpg
806 ms
dsc_7342_310x150.jpg
1136 ms
dsc_7341_310x150.jpg
1145 ms
workforus-100px.png
971 ms
mpn-150px.png
1028 ms
ISO27001-150x150.gif
1100 ms
safeharbor-150.png
1218 ms
privacytrust-150.png
1240 ms
ccss-150x150.png
1714 ms
locked43-80px.png
1333 ms
contactus-80px.png
1356 ms
analytics.js
84 ms
widgets.js
90 ms
LFiq1xkpl7A
112 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTYnF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
39 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTZ1r3JsPcQLi8jytr04NNhU.woff
60 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
39 ms
K88pR3goAWT7BTt32Z01mz8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
79 ms
MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSonF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
64 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzInF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
64 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzJ1r3JsPcQLi8jytr04NNhU.woff
82 ms
EInbV5DfGHOiMmvb1Xr-hp1r3JsPcQLi8jytr04NNhU.woff
101 ms
iconFont.svg
2397 ms
__utm.gif
41 ms
collect
42 ms
timeline.d11f7a3b3287fb94220e8ee6d03cc772.js
140 ms
www-embed-player-vflfNyN_r.css
80 ms
www-embed-player.js
113 ms
base.js
202 ms
syndication
237 ms
278888026212540417
305 ms
Tqng9ngJVK4Gqvh3e602hP-HqlN49KFEUSDtmrOPmWo.js
67 ms
ad_status.js
73 ms
zN7GBFwfMP4uA6AR0HCoLQ.ttf
110 ms
RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
110 ms
proxy.jpg
22 ms
timeline.47ab5d19e8ed22531abcf4f86f3ae53a.light.ltr.css
28 ms
timeline.47ab5d19e8ed22531abcf4f86f3ae53a.light.ltr.css
61 ms
S18DQeCU_normal.png
124 ms
Mv4fgDci_normal.jpg
148 ms
jot
23 ms
applicable.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
applicable.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
applicable.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Applicable.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Applicable.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
applicable.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Applicable. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: