2.3 sec in total
245 ms
1.8 sec
254 ms
Visit archaeologyreportsonline.com now to see the best up-to-date Archaeology Reports Online content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about archaeologyreportsonline.com
Archaeology Reports Online - An online archaeological journal
Visit archaeologyreportsonline.comWe analyzed Archaeologyreportsonline.com page load time and found that the first response time was 245 ms and then it took 2.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.
archaeologyreportsonline.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.1 s
45/100
10%
Value5.4 s
20/100
25%
Value6.3 s
41/100
10%
Value230 ms
86/100
30%
Value0.244
51/100
15%
Value10.3 s
24/100
10%
245 ms
392 ms
298 ms
447 ms
227 ms
Our browser made a total of 78 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 60% of them (47 requests) were addressed to the original Archaeologyreportsonline.com, 35% (27 requests) were made to Tile.openstreetmap.org and 3% (2 requests) were made to Ssl.google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (613 ms) belongs to the original domain Archaeologyreportsonline.com.
Page size can be reduced by 925.5 kB (26%)
3.6 MB
2.7 MB
In fact, the total size of Archaeologyreportsonline.com main page is 3.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.8 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 54.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 54.6 kB or 89% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 303.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Archaeology Reports Online needs image optimization as it can save up to 303.7 kB or 11% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 285.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 285.5 kB or 69% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 281.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Archaeologyreportsonline.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 281.8 kB or 84% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 39 (52%)
75
36
The browser has sent 75 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Archaeology Reports Online. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
archaeologyreportsonline.com
245 ms
archaeologyreportsonline.com
392 ms
bootstrap.css
298 ms
bootstrap.min.css
447 ms
style.css
227 ms
cookiecuttr.css
247 ms
leaflet.css
328 ms
leaflet.js
493 ms
map.css
303 ms
leaflet.groupedlayercontrol.css
330 ms
L.Control.SlideMenu.css
374 ms
fontawesome-all.min.css
455 ms
jquery.min.js
20 ms
bootstrap.min.js
491 ms
bootstrap-slider.js
575 ms
jquery.cookie.js
521 ms
jquery.cookiecuttr.js
525 ms
exampledata.js
613 ms
mainMap.js
574 ms
leaflet.groupedlayercontrol.js
592 ms
widgets.js
18 ms
carousel.js
597 ms
ga.js
21 ms
divider1.png
111 ms
ARO_header1.png
344 ms
OpenAccessLogoCopy.png
111 ms
ARO58Cover.jpg
169 ms
ARO57_Cover.jpg
168 ms
ARO56_Cover.jpg
177 ms
ARO55_Cover.jpg
180 ms
ARO54_Cover.jpg
350 ms
ARO53_Cover.jpg
319 ms
ARO52_Cover.jpg
256 ms
ARO51_Cover.jpg
257 ms
ARO50_Cover.jpg
329 ms
ARO49_Cover.jpg
336 ms
xlogoWhite.png
342 ms
__utm.gif
66 ms
19.png
68 ms
Medieval.png
402 ms
18.png
51 ms
19.png
54 ms
19.png
53 ms
20.png
51 ms
18.png
52 ms
18.png
52 ms
20.png
57 ms
20.png
55 ms
19.png
55 ms
19.png
54 ms
18.png
57 ms
18.png
59 ms
20.png
58 ms
20.png
61 ms
19.png
58 ms
19.png
58 ms
18.png
59 ms
18.png
60 ms
20.png
59 ms
20.png
62 ms
19.png
61 ms
19.png
63 ms
18.png
61 ms
18.png
64 ms
20.png
62 ms
20.png
64 ms
IronAge.png
390 ms
BronzeAge.png
389 ms
Neolithic.png
420 ms
EarlyModern.png
424 ms
Mesolithic.png
425 ms
Holocene.png
462 ms
PostMedieval.png
465 ms
Roman.png
465 ms
UpperPalaeolithic.png
505 ms
AllReports.png
508 ms
ARO58.jpg
321 ms
glyphicons-halflings-regular.woff
310 ms
archaeologyreportsonline.com accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
ARIA input fields do not have accessible names
Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
archaeologyreportsonline.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
archaeologyreportsonline.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
![]()
EN
![]()
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Archaeologyreportsonline.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Archaeologyreportsonline.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
archaeologyreportsonline.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Archaeology Reports Online. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: