7.8 sec in total
281 ms
7 sec
526 ms
Visit archallenge.com now to see the best up-to-date Archallenge content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about archallenge.com
Concursos para estudiantes de arquitectura. Descubre los mejores concursos, los más reales y en las mejores condiciones. ¿Te apuntas?
Visit archallenge.comWe analyzed Archallenge.com page load time and found that the first response time was 281 ms and then it took 7.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.
archallenge.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.0 s
22/100
10%
Value12.0 s
0/100
25%
Value7.4 s
27/100
10%
Value1,770 ms
10/100
30%
Value0.049
99/100
15%
Value16.5 s
5/100
10%
281 ms
533 ms
74 ms
608 ms
351 ms
Our browser made a total of 73 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 78% of them (57 requests) were addressed to the original Archallenge.com, 4% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 4% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Archallenge.com.
Page size can be reduced by 782.4 kB (15%)
5.1 MB
4.3 MB
In fact, the total size of Archallenge.com main page is 5.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 4.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 19.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 3.8 kB, which is 15% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 19.6 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 349.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Archallenge images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 136.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 136.0 kB or 50% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 276.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Archallenge.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 276.9 kB or 76% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 25 (42%)
60
35
The browser has sent 60 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Archallenge. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 15 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
archallenge.com
281 ms
www.archallenge.com
533 ms
font-awesome.min.css
74 ms
bootstrap.min.css
608 ms
bootstrap-responsive.min.css
351 ms
style-responsive.min.css
239 ms
archallenge.css
252 ms
style.min.css
353 ms
jquery-1.9.1.min.js
638 ms
bootstrap.min.js
573 ms
jquery.touchSwipe.min.js
416 ms
jquery.placeholder.min.js
476 ms
jquery-easing-1.3.js
462 ms
jquery.animate-enhanced.min.js
531 ms
jquery.superslides.min.js
582 ms
js
110 ms
jquery.gmap.min.js
631 ms
modernizr.js
648 ms
archallenge.min.js
700 ms
social-icons.css
419 ms
font-awesome.min.css
420 ms
font-awesome-ie7.min.css
423 ms
glyphicons.css
664 ms
halflings.css
569 ms
linecons.css
964 ms
css
97 ms
css
133 ms
css
177 ms
analytics.js
284 ms
logo_b.png
196 ms
s1.jpg
804 ms
s1.jpg
1084 ms
s1.jpg
771 ms
s1.jpg
901 ms
arrow-right.png
191 ms
arrow-left.png
386 ms
miniatura.jpg
847 ms
miniatura.jpg
874 ms
miniatura.jpg
1282 ms
miniatura.jpg
1296 ms
1.png
947 ms
2.png
981 ms
3.png
1010 ms
4.png
1076 ms
5.png
1110 ms
6.png
1153 ms
7.png
1224 ms
8.png
1345 ms
9.png
1282 ms
9k-RPmcnxYEPm8CNFsH2gg.woff
200 ms
KT3KS9Aol4WfR6Vas8kNcg.woff
185 ms
wkfQbvfT_02e2IWO3yYueQ.woff
244 ms
fontawesome-webfont-62877.woff
1129 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
182 ms
din_alternate-webfont.woff
284 ms
collect
154 ms
b7ea24ac-7f5f-4e14-b4f5-ee0ce7d13b85.js
380 ms
s1.jpg
1491 ms
s1.jpg
1678 ms
s1.jpg
1457 ms
s1.jpg
1568 ms
collect
284 ms
din_alternate-webfont.ttf
145 ms
din_alternate-webfont.svg
112 ms
s1.jpg
514 ms
s1.jpg
1003 ms
s1.jpg
838 ms
s1.jpg
1327 ms
s1.jpg
1119 ms
s1.jpg
1187 ms
s1.jpg
1200 ms
s1.jpg
3515 ms
fontawesome-webfont-62877.ttf
1011 ms
archallenge.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
archallenge.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools
archallenge.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
N/A
ES
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Archallenge.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is Spanish. Our system also found out that Archallenge.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
archallenge.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Archallenge. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: