7.8 sec in total
3.4 sec
4.3 sec
148 ms
Visit archetyped.com now to see the best up-to-date Archetyped content for Turkey and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about archetyped.com
Smart Tools
Visit archetyped.comWe analyzed Archetyped.com page load time and found that the first response time was 3.4 sec and then it took 4.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
archetyped.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.9 s
51/100
10%
Value4.9 s
28/100
25%
Value3.7 s
86/100
10%
Value170 ms
92/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value4.6 s
81/100
10%
3414 ms
79 ms
26 ms
157 ms
141 ms
Our browser made a total of 56 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 86% of them (48 requests) were addressed to the original Archetyped.com, 9% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Archetyped.com.
Page size can be reduced by 247.8 kB (59%)
421.8 kB
174.0 kB
In fact, the total size of Archetyped.com main page is 421.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 295.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 16.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 16.8 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 3.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Archetyped images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 195.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 195.6 kB or 66% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 32.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Archetyped.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 32.4 kB or 84% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 39 (78%)
50
11
The browser has sent 50 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Archetyped. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 36 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
archetyped.com
3414 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
79 ms
css
26 ms
app.css
157 ms
app.css
141 ms
jquery.js
269 ms
lib.core.js
148 ms
external-tracking.min.js
160 ms
shCore.js
162 ms
shBrushAS3.js
215 ms
shBrushBash.js
221 ms
shBrushColdFusion.js
239 ms
shBrushClojure.js
465 ms
shBrushCpp.js
234 ms
shBrushCSharp.js
319 ms
shBrushCss.js
318 ms
shBrushDelphi.js
318 ms
shBrushDiff.js
319 ms
shBrushErlang.js
342 ms
shBrushFSharp.js
366 ms
shBrushGroovy.js
376 ms
shBrushJava.js
382 ms
shBrushJavaFX.js
386 ms
shBrushJScript.js
414 ms
shBrushLatex.js
436 ms
shBrushMatlabKey.js
442 ms
shBrushObjC.js
455 ms
shBrushPerl.js
465 ms
shBrushPhp.js
487 ms
shBrushPlain.js
509 ms
shBrushPowerShell.js
513 ms
shBrushPython.js
525 ms
shBrushR.js
534 ms
shBrushRuby.js
535 ms
shBrushScala.js
560 ms
shBrushSql.js
581 ms
shBrushVb.js
586 ms
shBrushXml.js
597 ms
wp-embed.min.js
535 ms
analytics.js
27 ms
logo_square.png
320 ms
toggle-icon.png
343 ms
cover.jpg
568 ms
montserrat-regular.svg
356 ms
zhcz-_WihjSQC0oHJ9TCYMDdSZkkecOE1hvV7ZHvhyU.ttf
23 ms
montserrat-bold.svg
364 ms
IQHow_FEYlDC4Gzy_m8fcsBaWKZ57bY3RXgXH6dOjZ0.ttf
33 ms
opensans-regular.svg
542 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3SZ2oysoEQEeKwjgmXLRnTc.ttf
47 ms
opensans-light.svg
436 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTZS3E-kSBmtLoNJPDtbj2Pk.ttf
47 ms
opensans-bold.svg
411 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzJS3E-kSBmtLoNJPDtbj2Pk.ttf
43 ms
collect
14 ms
shCore.css
149 ms
shThemeDefault.css
155 ms
archetyped.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
archetyped.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
archetyped.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Archetyped.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Archetyped.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
archetyped.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Archetyped. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: