Report Summary

  • 18

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    34% of other websites

  • 47

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 20% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 77

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    36% of websites

architecturaldesigns.com

Architectural Designs - Selling quality house plans for generations

Page Load Speed

75.7 sec in total

First Response

328 ms

Resources Loaded

53 sec

Page Rendered

22.3 sec

architecturaldesigns.com screenshot

About Website

Visit architecturaldesigns.com now to see the best up-to-date Architectural Designs content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about architecturaldesigns.com

Search our collection of 30k+ house plans by over 200 designers and architects to find the perfect home plan to build. All house plans can be modified.

Visit architecturaldesigns.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Architecturaldesigns.com page load time and found that the first response time was 328 ms and then it took 75.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 95% of websites can load faster. Unfortunately, there were 23 request timeouts, which can generally increase the web page load time, as the browser stays idle while waiting for website response.

Performance Metrics

architecturaldesigns.com performance score

18

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.6 s

14/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value8.3 s

2/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value10.7 s

7/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value7,140 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.031

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value22.3 s

1/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

architecturaldesigns.com

328 ms

www.architecturaldesigns.com

930 ms

application-d7b2238216e8a41688d8649932e52fe86d9a2bc51b46bfdea0d77e3d4bcf3343.css

2774 ms

application-ce92d21183df270ba733d021814e97a9d3d4303d264c4227fd3bb11814fc936e.js

4789 ms

adsbygoogle.js

2256 ms

Our browser made a total of 92 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Architecturaldesigns.com, 24% (22 requests) were made to S3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com and 21% (19 requests) were made to Duy9kz4k2j2e3.cloudfront.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (21.7 sec) relates to the external source S3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.3 MB (56%)

Content Size

2.3 MB

After Optimization

1.0 MB

In fact, the total size of Architecturaldesigns.com main page is 2.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 1.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-76%

Potential reduce by 54.2 kB

  • Original 71.4 kB
  • After minification 70.2 kB
  • After compression 17.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 54.2 kB or 76% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-13%

Potential reduce by 71.1 kB

  • Original 538.5 kB
  • After minification 467.3 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Architectural Designs needs image optimization as it can save up to 71.1 kB or 13% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-63%

Potential reduce by 813.1 kB

  • Original 1.3 MB
  • After minification 1.3 MB
  • After compression 474.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 813.1 kB or 63% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 365.6 kB

  • Original 445.5 kB
  • After minification 439.7 kB
  • After compression 79.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Architecturaldesigns.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 365.6 kB or 82% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 37 (67%)

Requests Now

55

After Optimization

18

The browser has sent 55 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Architectural Designs. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 18 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

architecturaldesigns.com accessibility score

47

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

High

ARIA IDs are not unique

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

architecturaldesigns.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

architecturaldesigns.com SEO score

77

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Architecturaldesigns.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Architecturaldesigns.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Architectural Designs. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: