Report Summary

  • 17

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    32% of other websites

  • 91

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 77% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 97

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    91% of websites

arfp.org

ARMY-RELATED FANPAGE

Page Load Speed

1.2 sec in total

First Response

245 ms

Resources Loaded

801 ms

Page Rendered

199 ms

arfp.org screenshot

About Website

Welcome to arfp.org homepage info - get ready to check Arfp best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about arfp.org

Welcome to Army-Related Fanpage Where you can find any post related to military information and history NOTIFY ME! About ARFP A little bit information about us We are here just for every military, arm...

Visit arfp.org

Key Findings

We analyzed Arfp.org page load time and found that the first response time was 245 ms and then it took 1000 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

arfp.org performance score

17

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value10.7 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value28.5 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value21.2 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,120 ms

7/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.064

97/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value27.3 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

arfp.org

245 ms

normalize.css

66 ms

flexslider.css

66 ms

basic-style.css

107 ms

font-awesome.min.css

87 ms

Our browser made a total of 47 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 60% of them (28 requests) were addressed to the original Arfp.org, 15% (7 requests) were made to Google.com and 6% (3 requests) were made to Cse.google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (404 ms) belongs to the original domain Arfp.org.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 230.1 kB (20%)

Content Size

1.1 MB

After Optimization

906.7 kB

In fact, the total size of Arfp.org main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 908.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-73%

Potential reduce by 33.4 kB

  • Original 45.8 kB
  • After minification 43.0 kB
  • After compression 12.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 33.4 kB or 73% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-7%

Potential reduce by 63.9 kB

  • Original 908.7 kB
  • After minification 844.9 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Arfp images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-63%

Potential reduce by 56.8 kB

  • Original 90.7 kB
  • After minification 88.8 kB
  • After compression 33.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 56.8 kB or 63% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 76.0 kB

  • Original 91.5 kB
  • After minification 70.0 kB
  • After compression 15.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Arfp.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 76.0 kB or 83% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 19 (44%)

Requests Now

43

After Optimization

24

The browser has sent 43 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Arfp. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 15 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

arfp.org accessibility score

91

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

arfp.org best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

arfp.org SEO score

97

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Arfp.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Arfp.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Arfp. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: