3 sec in total
29 ms
1.2 sec
1.8 sec
Click here to check amazing Ars Technica content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about arstechnica.com
Serving the Technologist for more than a decade. IT news, reviews, and analysis.
Visit arstechnica.comWe analyzed Arstechnica.com page load time and found that the first response time was 29 ms and then it took 3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
arstechnica.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.7 s
29/100
10%
Value6.7 s
7/100
25%
Value24.4 s
0/100
10%
Value14,160 ms
0/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value49.8 s
0/100
10%
29 ms
94 ms
133 ms
171 ms
184 ms
Our browser made a total of 84 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Arstechnica.com, 74% (62 requests) were made to Cdn.arstechnica.net and 5% (4 requests) were made to Cdn.cookielaw.org. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (827 ms) relates to the external source Arstechnica-apps.s3.amazonaws.com.
Page size can be reduced by 386.3 kB (24%)
1.6 MB
1.2 MB
In fact, the total size of Arstechnica.com main page is 1.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 995.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 87.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 87.1 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 33.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Ars Technica images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 245.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 245.9 kB or 62% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 19.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Arstechnica.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 19.6 kB or 22% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 21 (32%)
65
44
The browser has sent 65 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ars Technica. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 19 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
arstechnica.com
29 ms
arstechnica.com
94 ms
main-1eae76c908.css
133 ms
otSDKStub.js
171 ms
otCCPAiab.js
184 ms
gpt.js
339 ms
ars-technica.min.js
165 ms
ars-dc1d08cbd8.ads.us.js
127 ms
style.min.css
127 ms
comments.css
155 ms
paywall.css
126 ms
main-db925e406c.js
159 ms
p.js
162 ms
100098X1555750.skimlinks.js
158 ms
index.js
151 ms
iframeResizer.min.js
150 ms
iframe.js
150 ms
b10882a1-8446-4e7d-bfb2-ce2c770ad910.json
166 ms
conde-asa-polar-master.js
492 ms
dnsfeed
513 ms
gtm.js
580 ms
v2fumwIJOo-LsCB0dlG18VSTW43CpWhUEPJuKeRTzrEQdSPPlMr5GymU
462 ms
Original-code-on-new-cart-with-Vectrex-760x380.jpg
290 ms
GettyImages-503452266.jpg
827 ms
overlay-square-listing-d6058551c4.png
239 ms
Screenshot-2024-01-04-133106-360x200.png
242 ms
image-360x200.jpeg
240 ms
getty-turbotax-360x200.jpg
239 ms
GettyImages-1230927617-360x200.jpg
239 ms
fraud-kit-300x150.jpg
414 ms
Snapdragon-XR2_XR2-Gen-2-Ref-Platform-360x200.webp
413 ms
Lyriq-listing-image-360x200.jpg
416 ms
latest_1024_0193-360x200.jpg
415 ms
xps--360x200.jpg
415 ms
copilot-key-360x200.jpg
413 ms
doesnt-exist-150x150.jpg
422 ms
640px-Couple_01-150x150.jpeg
421 ms
GettyImages-963794324-150x150.jpeg
421 ms
CC_en_screenshot_4-150x150.jpeg
415 ms
3-1-150x150.jpg
428 ms
elon-musk-150x150.jpg
427 ms
server-admin-150x150.jpg
442 ms
Steven-Reece-Lewis-150x150.jpg
445 ms
Screenshot-2024-01-03-at-12.57.29%E2%80%AFPM-150x150.png
458 ms
F-150-Lightning-16-360x200.jpg
457 ms
GettyImages-1048464296-360x200.jpg
483 ms
starlink-direct-to-cell-360x200.jpeg
482 ms
GettyImages-615410707-360x200.jpg
500 ms
amazon-visa-360x200.jpg
506 ms
tesla-fremont-360x200.jpg
503 ms
rebel1-360x200.jpg
502 ms
20240102f9booster-360x200.jpg
507 ms
desert5-360x200.jpg
508 ms
tetrisrecord-150x150.png
605 ms
vizio-150x150.jpg
618 ms
value-drop-150x150.jpg
617 ms
Screenshot-2024-01-02-at-3.00.28%E2%80%AFPM-150x150.png
617 ms
GettyImages-90738405-150x150.jpg
622 ms
ai_mickey_hero-150x150.jpg
622 ms
location
375 ms
getty-michael-cohen-150x150.jpg
482 ms
privacyoptions123x59-c5c9972158.png
482 ms
economica-regular-otf-webfont.woff
479 ms
economica-bold-otf-webfont.woff
482 ms
bitter-regular-webfont.woff
481 ms
bitter-bold-webfont.woff
480 ms
pubads_impl.js
346 ms
arstechnica.js
392 ms
376 ms
opensans-regular-webfont.woff
309 ms
opensans-light-webfont.woff
308 ms
opensans-semibold-webfont.woff
309 ms
opensans-bold-webfont.woff
313 ms
opensans-extrabold-webfont.woff
312 ms
bitter-italic-webfont.woff
312 ms
opensans-italic-webfont.woff
306 ms
opensans-lightitalic-webfont.woff
305 ms
opensans-semibolditalic-webfont.woff
304 ms
plugin.js
299 ms
condenastcorporate
79 ms
opensans-bolditalic-webfont.woff
379 ms
opensans-extrabolditalic-webfont.woff
375 ms
otBannerSdk.js
168 ms
v2
199 ms
arstechnica.com accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
arstechnica.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
arstechnica.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Arstechnica.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Arstechnica.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
arstechnica.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Ars Technica. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: