8.9 sec in total
1.5 sec
6.9 sec
493 ms
Welcome to artaweb.net homepage info - get ready to check Artaweb best content for Oman right away, or after learning these important things about artaweb.net
سون هاست، ارایه دهنده میزبانی وب بهترین کیفیت. محصولات هاست لینوکس، هاست ویندوز، هاست وردپرس، ثبت دامنه، نمایندگی هاست، سرور مجازی و اختصاصی، پر سرعت و ارزان، بهترین در نوع خود
Visit artaweb.netWe analyzed Artaweb.net page load time and found that the first response time was 1.5 sec and then it took 7.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
artaweb.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.1 s
22/100
10%
Value4.2 s
43/100
25%
Value4.1 s
79/100
10%
Value230 ms
86/100
30%
Value0.079
94/100
15%
Value6.6 s
57/100
10%
1546 ms
61 ms
257 ms
263 ms
343 ms
Our browser made a total of 98 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 60% of them (59 requests) were addressed to the original Artaweb.net, 35% (34 requests) were made to Clients.artaweb.net and 2% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.9 sec) relates to the external source Clients.artaweb.net.
Page size can be reduced by 1.1 MB (68%)
1.7 MB
533.0 kB
In fact, the total size of Artaweb.net main page is 1.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 867.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 31.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 31.1 kB or 78% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 18.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Artaweb needs image optimization as it can save up to 18.9 kB or 11% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 588.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 588.3 kB or 68% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 503.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Artaweb.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 503.8 kB or 86% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 73 (78%)
94
21
The browser has sent 94 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Artaweb. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 25 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 26 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
artaweb.net
1546 ms
css
61 ms
rtl.css
257 ms
normalize.css
263 ms
foundation.css
343 ms
font-awesome.min.css
257 ms
animate.min.css
270 ms
morphext.css
254 ms
owl.carousel.css
511 ms
owl.theme.css
513 ms
owl.transitions.css
511 ms
slicknav.css
513 ms
style.css
528 ms
modernizr.js
599 ms
colorbox.css
765 ms
styles.css
764 ms
prettyphoto.css
768 ms
nimble-portfolio.css
768 ms
skin.css
781 ms
skin.css
852 ms
jquery.js
1117 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
1029 ms
jquery.colorbox-min.js
1027 ms
app.php
782 ms
jquery.js
1106 ms
foundation.min.js
1111 ms
hoverIntent.js
1110 ms
superfish.min.js
1294 ms
morphext.min.js
1285 ms
wow.min.js
1368 ms
jquery.slicknav.min.js
1366 ms
waypoints.min.js
1366 ms
jquery.animateNumber.min.js
1392 ms
owl.carousel.min.js
1544 ms
custom.js
1549 ms
jquery.form.min.js
1650 ms
scripts.js
1620 ms
prettyphoto.js
1652 ms
sort.js
1650 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
1183 ms
genericons.css
1115 ms
a
457 ms
header_bg.jpg
453 ms
logo.png
103 ms
careers.png
102 ms
delivery.png
489 ms
pay.png
484 ms
select.png
495 ms
tick-21.png
558 ms
server-features-1.png
554 ms
server-features-6.png
723 ms
server-features-5.png
747 ms
server-features-4.png
749 ms
server-features-2.png
771 ms
server-features-3.png
817 ms
Yekan.woff
799 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
1200 ms
analytics.js
231 ms
app.php
413 ms
overlay.png
697 ms
controls.png
880 ms
border.png
856 ms
loading_background.png
881 ms
loading.gif
869 ms
collect
12 ms
collect
53 ms
fonts.css
346 ms
main.css
362 ms
widget-mobile.css
350 ms
jquery.mCustomScrollbar.css
346 ms
bootstrap.css
363 ms
app.php
421 ms
app.php
688 ms
error-tracking.js
668 ms
customer-chat-widget-libs.min.js
978 ms
customer-chat-widget.min.js
795 ms
emot-1.png
786 ms
emot-2.png
800 ms
emot-3.png
1018 ms
emot-4.png
1018 ms
emot-5.png
1142 ms
emot-6.png
1255 ms
emot-7.png
1236 ms
emot-8.png
1258 ms
emot-9.png
1291 ms
emot-10.png
1284 ms
emot-11.png
1452 ms
emot-12.png
1554 ms
emot-13.png
1547 ms
emot-14.png
1552 ms
emot-15.png
1547 ms
emot-16.png
1556 ms
emot-17.png
1729 ms
emot-18.png
1834 ms
emot-19.png
1852 ms
emot-20.png
1849 ms
loading.gif
1827 ms
glyphicons-halflings-white.png
1176 ms
artaweb.net accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
artaweb.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
artaweb.net SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
FA
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Artaweb.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Persian is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed English language. Our system also found out that Artaweb.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
artaweb.net
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Artaweb. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: