Report Summary

  • 27

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    47% of other websites

  • 92

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 80% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    81% of websites

  • 95

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    91% of websites

Page Load Speed

931 ms in total

First Response

90 ms

Resources Loaded

759 ms

Page Rendered

82 ms

arthurcottonmoore.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Arthurcottonmoore content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about arthurcottonmoore.com

Arthur Cotton Moore has achieved national and international recognition as an Architect, Planner, Furniture Designer, and Painter...

Visit arthurcottonmoore.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Arthurcottonmoore.com page load time and found that the first response time was 90 ms and then it took 841 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 15% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

arthurcottonmoore.com performance score

27

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.4 s

71/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value8.6 s

1/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.7 s

36/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value8,990 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value15.0 s

7/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.arthurcottonmoore.com

90 ms

minified.js

95 ms

focus-within-polyfill.js

93 ms

polyfill.min.js

217 ms

bootstrap-features.d21499e7.bundle.min.js

245 ms

Our browser made a total of 19 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 5% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Arthurcottonmoore.com, 79% (15 requests) were made to Static.parastorage.com and 5% (1 request) were made to Polyfill.io. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (306 ms) relates to the external source Static.wixstatic.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 265.6 kB (65%)

Content Size

409.2 kB

After Optimization

143.6 kB

In fact, the total size of Arthurcottonmoore.com main page is 409.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 359.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-74%

Potential reduce by 265.5 kB

  • Original 359.8 kB
  • After minification 358.3 kB
  • After compression 94.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 265.5 kB or 74% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 5.7 kB
  • After minification 5.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Arthurcottonmoore images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 48 B

  • Original 43.7 kB
  • After minification 43.7 kB
  • After compression 43.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 9 (60%)

Requests Now

15

After Optimization

6

The browser has sent 15 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Arthurcottonmoore. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 10 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

arthurcottonmoore.com accessibility score

92

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

Best Practices

arthurcottonmoore.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

arthurcottonmoore.com SEO score

95

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Arthurcottonmoore.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Arthurcottonmoore.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Arthurcottonmoore. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: